Cited by 123Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and health

Evaluation of in vitro probiotic potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus OZF isolated from human breast milk

Osmanagaoglu, Ozlem, Kiran, Fadime, Ataoglu, Haluk·2010·Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the probiotic properties of Pediococcus pentosaceus OZF isolated from human breast milk. The results obtained so far suggest that the strain is resistant to low pH, bile salt, pepsin and pancreatin, so it could survive while passing through the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract and reveal its potential probiotic action on host organism. The strain was non-pathogenic (γ-hemolytic), produced anti-Listerial bacteriocin, exhibited a strong autoaggregating phenotype (85.71%) and demonstrated 6.26 and 12.99% coaggregation with Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium SL 1344 and Escherichia coli LMG 3083 (ETEC), respectively. The degree of adhesion of Ped. pentosaceus OZF to the human Caco-2 cell line was investigated and when compared to the adhesion of pathogenic strains tested, it was shown to inhibit the growth of human enterotoxigenic E. coli LMG 3083 (ETEC) and of Salm. Typhimurium SL 1344. Ped. pentosaceus OZF seems to adhere to human intestinal cells via mechanisms that involve different combinations of carbohydrate and lipid factors on the bacteria and eukaryotic cell surface. The percentage of adhesion to n-hexadecane was 34% showing that the surface was rather hydrophilic. Higher affinity displayed by Ped. pentosaceus OZF for chloroform demonstrates the basic property of a cell, which may be due to the presence of carboxylic groups on the cell surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12602-010-9050-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 123

Authors
Osmanagaoglu, O., Kiran, F., & Ataoglu, H.
Venue
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
Published
2010-08-13
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
162-174
ISSN
  • 1867-1306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-1314
OpenAlex
W2036913117
Cited by
123
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ankara Universitesi
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
Pediococcus pentosaceus, probiotic potential, breast milk, bile salt tolerance, acid resistance, self-aggregation, co-aggregation, Caco-2 cell adhesion, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, cell surface hydrophobicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review