Cited by 42Sustainability in Higher EducationInnovations in Medical EducationGlobal Health and Surgery

Anesthesia environmental sustainability programs-a survey of Canadian department chiefs and residency program directors

Open access
Petre, Maria-Alexandra, Bahrey, Lisa, Levine, Mark, van Rensburg, Adriaan, Crawford, Mark, Matava, Clyde T.·2020·Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Abstract

Introduction Anesthesia-related activities contribute to operating room waste impacting climate change. The aim of this study was to ascertain 1) the current existence and scope of department and education programs concerned with anesthesia "green" practice; and 2) perceived barriers to environmental sustainability efforts among Canadian anesthesia department chiefs and residency program directors.Methods Association of Canadian University Departments of Anesthesia-affiliated anesthesiology department chiefs (n = 113) were invited to complete an online survey ascertaining current efforts in, and barriers to, environmentally sustainable anesthesia practice. Similarly, Canadian anesthesiology residency program directors (n = 17) were invited to complete an online survey delineating current educational programs on environmental sustainability and identifying interest in, and barriers to, developing a Canada-wide curriculum.Results The response rates for department chiefs and program directors were 23% (26/113) and 41% (7/17), respectively. Department chiefs indicated that their departments participate in sustainability efforts such as donating medical equipment (65%) and recycling (58%). Despite interest in environmental sustainability, department chiefs identified inadequate funding (72%), lack of a mandate (64%), and inadequate knowledge (60%) as barriers to implementing environmentally sustainable practices. Only 29% of responding Canadian anesthesiology programs include environmental sustainability in their curriculum. Responding residency program directors believe residents would benefit from more teaching on the topic (86%) but identified barriers including a lack of faculty expertise (100%) and time constraints (71%). Respondents (71%) also indicated an interest in developing a Canadian curriculum on the topic.Conclusion Our results highlight current attitudes, gaps, and barriers to environmentally sustainable anesthesiology practice among departmental and educational leadership. Furthermore, this study identifies potential opportunities to develop cross-Canada collaborative educational programs in this field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12630-020-01738-w

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endoscopy services and anesthetic procedures seem to be the most wasteful procedures.

    “in particular, endoscopy services and anesthetic procedures seem to be the most wasteful procedures [13,15,21].”

    From Waste Management and the Perspective of a Green Hospital—A Systematic Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says anesthetic practice contributes significantly to waste associated with surgery. It does not discuss endoscopy services or establish that either type of procedure is among the most wasteful. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inadequate knowledge (60%) was identified as one of the main barriers to implement environmentally sustainable practices.

    “Inadequate knowledge (60%) was identified as one of the main barriers to implement environmentally sustainable practices [21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 42

Authors
Petre, M.-A., Bahrey, L., Levine, M., van Rensburg, A., Crawford, M., & Matava, C. T.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
1190-1200
ISSN
  • 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
  • 1496-8975
OpenAlex
W3034688425
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
environmental sustainability, operating room waste, climate change, sustainability curriculum, barriers to sustainability, medical equipment donation, recycling, faculty attitudes
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Canada, Curriculum, Humans, Internship and Residency, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review