The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for E-commerce recommendation system
Open accessAbstract
The rise of e-commerce has not only given consumers more choice but has also caused information overload. In order to quickly find favorite items from vast resources, users are eager for technology by which websites can automatically deliver items in which they may be interested. Thus, recommender systems are created and developed to automate the recommendation process. In the field of collaborative filtering recommendations, the accuracy requirement of the recommendation algorithm always makes it complex and difficult to implement one algorithm. The slope one algorithm is not only easy to implement but also works efficient and effective. However, the prediction accuracy of the slope one algorithm is not very high. Moreover, the slope one algorithm does not perform so well when dealing with personalized recommendation tasks that concern the relationship among users. To solve these problems, we propose a slope one algorithm based on the fusion of trusted data and user similarity, which can be deployed in various recommender systems. This algorithm comprises three procedures. First, we should select trusted data. Second, we should calculate the similarity between users. Third, we need to add this similarity to the weight factor of the improved slope one algorithm, and then, we get the final recommendation equation. We have carried out a number of experiments with the Amazon dataset, and the results prove that our recommender algorithm performs more accurately than the traditional slope one algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social influence modeling using information theory in mobile social networks
Peng, S., Yang, A., Cao, L., Yu, S., & Xie, D. (2017) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.023 · Cited by 200
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
Cloud-assisted secure ehealth systems for tamper-proofing EHR via blockchain
Cao, S., Zhang, G., Liu, P., Zhang, X., & Neri, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.038 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, L., Cheng, Y., Yang, L., Li, J., Yan, H., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
- Published
- 2018-06-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3023-3034
- ISSN
- 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-5145
- OpenAlex
- W2811035854
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for E-commerce recommendation system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12652-018-0928-7
- The paper
- Jiang, L., Cheng, Y., Yang, L., Li, J., Yan, H., & Wang, X. (2019). A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for E-commerce recommendation system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0928-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.