Cited by 1,040Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda

Open access
Kumar, Yogesh, Koul, Apeksha, Singla, Ruchi, Ijaz, Muhammad Fazal·2023·Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing

Abstract

Artificial intelligence can assist providers in a variety of patient care and intelligent health systems. Artificial intelligence techniques ranging from machine learning to deep learning are prevalent in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, and patient risk identification. Numerous medical data sources are required to perfectly diagnose diseases using artificial intelligence techniques, such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, genomics, computed tomography scan, etc. Furthermore, artificial intelligence primarily enhanced the infirmary experience and sped up preparing patients to continue their rehabilitation at home. This article covers the comprehensive survey based on artificial intelligence techniques to diagnose numerous diseases such as Alzheimer, cancer, diabetes, chronic heart disease, tuberculosis, stroke and cerebrovascular, hypertension, skin, and liver disease. We conducted an extensive survey including the used medical imaging dataset and their feature extraction and classification process for predictions. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines are used to select the articles published up to October 2020 on the Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, Excerpta Medical Database, and Psychology Information for early prediction of distinct kinds of diseases using artificial intelligence-based techniques. Based on the study of different articles on disease diagnosis, the results are also compared using various quality parameters such as prediction rate, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under curve precision, recall, and F1-score.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12652-021-03612-zThis paper is marked retracted.

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Babu BS, Likhitha V, Narendra I, Harika G (2019) Prediction and detection of heart attack using machine learning and internet of things. J Comput Sci 4:105–108
  2. Farokhzad M, Ebrahimi L (2016) A novel adapter neuro fuzzy inference system for the diagnosis of liver disease. J Acad Res Comput Eng 1:61–66
  3. Fukuda M, Inamoto K, Shibata N, Ariji Y, Kutsana S (2019) Evaluation of an artificial system for detecting vertical root fracture on panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol 36:1–7
  4. George A, Badagabettu S, Berra K, George L, Kamath V, Thimmappa L (2018) Prevention of cardiovascular disease in India. Clin Prev Cardiol 7:72–77. https://doi.org/10.4013/JCPC.JCPC_31_17 · DOI
  5. Isravel DP, Silas SVPD (2020) Improved heart disease diagnostic IoT model using machine learning techniques. Neuroscience 9:4442–4446
  6. Khaled E, Naseer S, Metwally N (2018) Diagnosis of hepatititus virus using arificial neural network. J Acad Pedagog Res 2:1–7
  7. Kolkur MS, Kalbande DR, Kharkar V (2018) Machine learning approaches to multi-class human skin disease Ddetection. Innov Healthc Tech 14:29–39
  8. Memon M, Li J, Haq A, Memon M (2019) Breast cancer detection in the Iot health environment using modified recursive feature selection. Wirel Commun Mob 2019:19
  9. Musleh M, Alajrami E, Khalil A, Nasser B, Barhoom A, Naser S (2019) Predicting liver patients using artificial neural network. J Acad Inf Syst Res 3:1–11
  10. Naser S, Naseer I (2019) Lung cancer detection using artificial neural network. J Eng Inf Syst 3:17–23
  11. Nasser I, Naser S et al (2019) Predicting tumor category using artificial neural network. Eng Inf Technol 3:1–7
  12. Ostovar A, Chimeh E, Fakoorfard Z (2020) The diagnostic value of CT scans in the process of diagnosing COVID-19 in medical centers. Health Technol Assess Act 4:1–7
  13. Panicker RO, Kalmady KS, Rajan J, Sabu MK (2018) Automatic detection of tuberculosis bacilli from microscopic sputum smear images using deep learning methods. Biocybern Biomed Eng 38(3):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.05.007 · DOI
  14. Patel SB (2016) Heart disease using machine learning and data minig techniques. Health Technol 10:1137–1144
  15. Romanini J, Barun L, Martins M, Carrard V (2020) Continuing education activities improve dentists self efficacy to manage oral mucosal lesions and oral cancer. Eur J Dent Educ 25:28–34
  16. Saranya E, Maheswaran T (2019) IOT based disease prediction and diagnosis system for healthcare. Healthc Technol 7:232–237
  17. Singh J, Tripathy A, Garg P, Kumar A (2020) Lung Alzheimer detection using anti-aliased convolutional networks networks. Proc Comput Sci 173:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.014 · DOI
  18. Srinivasu PN, Ahmed S, Alhumam A, Kumar AB, Ijaz MF (2021) An AW-HARIS based automated segmentation of human liver using CT images. Comput Mater Contin 69(3):3303–3319
  19. Thai DT, Minh QT, Phung PH (2017) Toward an IoT-based expert system for heart disease diagnosis. In: Modern artificial intelligence and cognitive science conference, vol 1964, pp 157–164
  20. Vasal S, Jain S, Verma A (2020) COVID-AI: an artificial intelligence system to diagnose COVID 19 disease. J Eng Res Technol 9:1–6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 999

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, Y., Koul, A., Singla, R., & Ijaz, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Indus University (IN)
  • Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (IN)
  • Sejong University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kumar, Yogesh
  • Koul, Apeksha
  • Singla, Ruchi
  • Ijaz, Muhammad Fazal
Venue
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
8459-8486
ISSN
  • 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-5145
OpenAlex
W4205941964
Cited by
1,040
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 332 · 2023: 200 · 2022: 48
FWCI
32.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
sejong university (Research fund)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, disease diagnosis, diagnostic imaging, deep learning, machine learning, medical image classification, feature extraction, early disease prediction, Alzheimer's disease, cancer diagnosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, skin diseases, liver disease, tuberculosis, stroke, chronic heart disease, model performance comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review