Using MBCT in a chronic pain setting: a qualitative analysis of participants’ experiences
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Believing in the benefits of practice can itself be a motivating factor in practicing mindfulness, and may thus contribute to the well-being of those who practice.
“Finally, Moore and Martin (2015) underlined that believing in the benefits of practice can itself be a motivating factor in practicing mindfulness, and may thus contribute to the wellbeing of those who practice.”
From Mindfulness-based programs sustainably increase mental health: The role of cognitive fusion and mindfulness practice (2024) · cites this paper as Moore and Martin (2015)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Moore, K. M., & Martin, M. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Moore, Kirsty M.
- ORCID
- Martin, Michelle E.
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2014-11-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1129-1136
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2055509962
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, chronic pain, patient experience, perceived benefits, perceived control, pain acceptance, mindfulness practice, comorbid depression, group intervention, pain management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review