Mindfulness in sex therapy and intimate relationships (MSIR): clinical protocol and theory development
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mindfulness has been used with couples who do not have cancer in order to improve sexual intimacy.
“Mindfulness has also been used with couples who do not have cancer in order to improve sexual intimacy.43”
From Preliminary Development of a Mindfulness-Based Group Therapy to Expand Couples’ Sexual Intimacy after Prostate Cancer: A Mixed Methods Approach (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Kocsis, A., & Newbury-Helps, J.
- Affiliations
- St Mary's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Newbury-Helps, John
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2016-04-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 690-699
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2336759283
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- there was no funding for this study (na)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- sex therapy, intimate relationships, sexual dysfunction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, group intervention, avoidance, sensory experience, theory development, women's sexual health, adjunctive therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
