Cited by 64Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and Memory

Mindfulness and cognitive functions: Toward a unifying neurocognitive framework

Raffone, Antonino, Srinivasan, Narayanan·2017·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0654-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 128 · Cited by 64

Authors
Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Allahabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Raffone, Antonino
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-12-13
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2561786020
Cited by
64
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação Bial
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
meditation training, cognitive function, response accuracy, reaction time (psychology), electrophysiological measures, neuroimaging, theoretical framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review