Mindfulness and cognitive functions: Toward a unifying neurocognitive framework
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mindfulness meditation practices alleviate stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms and induce subjective changes in meditators that result in improved cognitive functioning and general well-being.
“Several studies showed that these practices alleviate the stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, inducing subjective changes in meditators that result in improved cognitive functioning and general well-being [34,35,36,37].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- University of Allahabad (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Raffone, Antonino
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2016-12-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2561786020
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação Bial
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- meditation training, cognitive function, response accuracy, reaction time (psychology), electrophysiological measures, neuroimaging, theoretical framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review