Measuring Mindfulness: Applying Generalizability Theory to Distinguish between State and Trait
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
State resilience does not include the interaction between person, item, and occasion; that interaction represents error variance due to changes in understanding an item due to situational factors.
“Importantly, state resilience does not include the interaction between person, item, and occasion, as such interaction represents an error variance due to changes in understanding an item due to situational factors (Medvedev etal., 2017).”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Medvedev et al., 2017
G-theory can be used to reliably distinguish between trait and state aspects of a psychological construct such as resilience.
“G-theory can also be used to reliably distinguish between trait and state aspects of a psychological construct such as resilience (Medvedev etal., 2017).”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Medvedev et al., 2017
Trait aspects of a construct are resistant to change, while more dynamic aspects reflected by state items are easier to influence by means of an intervention.
“The research shows that trait aspects of a construct are resistant to change while more dynamic aspects reflected by state items are easier to influence by means of an intervention and such aspects should be a primary target of such interventions (Arterberry etal., 2014; Medvedev etal., 2017).”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Medvedev et al., 2017
Individual states by nature should vary across occasions as reflected by person-occasion interaction; therefore, error variance attributed to person x occasion interaction is reflective of a state component.
“Individual states by nature, should vary across occasions as reflected by person-occasion interaction. Therefore, the error variance attributed to person x occasion interaction is reflective of a state component (Medvedev etal., 2017).”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Medvedev et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Medvedev, Oleg N.
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2017-01-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1036-1046
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2582929280
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand (Vice-Chancellor’s Doctoral Scholarship)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- trait versus state, generalizability theory, measurement validity, true score variance, error variance, mindfulness measurement, psychometric validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
