Immediate and Lasting Chronic Pain Reduction Following a Brief Self-Implemented Mindfulness-Based Interoceptive Exposure Task: a Pilot Study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combined skill of monitoring and acceptance is a key mechanism of beneficial change in mindfulness-based interventions.
“The combined skill of monitoring and acceptance has been suggested to be a key mechanism of beneficial change (Cayoun et al. 2020; Lindsay and Creswell 2017).”
From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Cayoun et al. 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Cayoun, B., Simmons, A., & Shires, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cayoun, Bruno
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2017-10-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-124
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2761854067
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- chronic pain, interoception, mindfulness meditation, pain-related anxiety, pain intensity, pain duration, neuroplasticity, self-guided intervention, anxiety and depression, analgesic use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
