Cited by 59Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Tailoring Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skill Coaching in the Moment Through Smartphones: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Levin, Michael E., Haeger, Jack, Cruz, Rick A.·2019·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-1004-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 59

Authors
Levin, M. E., Haeger, J., & Cruz, R. A.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Michael E.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-07-21
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
689-699
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2883646499
Cited by
59
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, mobile application, mobile mental health intervention, ecological momentary assessment, psychological inflexibility, psychological distress, positive mental health, self-help apps, user satisfaction, app adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review