Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lessons from Medicine

Open access
Kabat-Zinn, Jon·2020·Mindfulness

Abstract

Just as there are few cures in medicine, in spite of all that is known about biology and disease, there are even fewer cures or quick fixes in the domain of the body politic. We work with the world as we find it and as we inhabit it, realizing that our understanding of events and our ability to shape outcomes are always limited, sometimes humblingly so. But, as we have discovered in medicine, that does not mean that profound healing cannot take place if the situation is met in ways that embrace the full spectrum of inner and outer resources for working even a bit more selflessly and orthogonally with what is, with things as they are, especially in the domain of the human mind and heart. The same is possible for the body politic. It too can be approached from a perspective of healing and transformation rather than merely fixing and curing, especially when the fixes can be potentially damaging to the patient and to the very potential for healing. That is precisely what the movement of mindfulness in various parliaments around the world is trying to accomplish. Obviously, it is what we might call, relatively speaking, a “top down approach.” At the same time, a certain mindful political organizing is going on more broadly in communities worldwide, in the United States through groups such as the Me Too movement, Black Lives Matter, and many others. If we are all cells within the one body politic of a country or the larger body of the planet itself, then the health of every one of those cells needs to be optimized. Everybody’s health and vital interests need to be met, recognized, and taken into account, while at the same time, we hold the larger interests of the well-being of the whole in mind as well, and protect them to whatever degree is consistent with the allegiance we pledge, as Americans, to the notion of “liberty and justice for all.” Just like themeditation practice itself, this is simple but far from easy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01369-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Kabat-Zinn, J.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1818-1822
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3023682205
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
medical practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lessons from Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12671-020-01369-8
The paper
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2020). Lessons from Medicine. Mindfulness. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01369-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.