The Invitation within the Cultivation of Mindfulness
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kabat-Zinn called mindfulness a "radical non-doing".
“In line with this receptive quality, Kabat-Zinn (2021) called mindfulness a “radical non-doing” (Kabat-Zinn, 2021, p. 1034).”
From Being able to think when caught in the maelstrom - how adolescents used mindfulness when facing exams. (2024) · cites this paper as Kabat-Zinn (2021)
Cites
How does mindfulness transform suffering? II: the transformation of <i>dukkha</i>
Teasdale, J. D., & Chaskalson (Kulananda), M. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564826 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dundas, I., & Binder, P.-E. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2024.2375660 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Still, he writes that the practices may inform later choice of actions and “opens us up to the possibility of acting at least a bit more wisely in this world” (Kabat-Zinn, 2021, p. 1037).”
Background
- Authors
- Kabat-Zinn, J.
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2021-01-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1034-1037
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W3122259361
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- invitations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
