Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Affirmative mindfulness, acceptance, and compassion-based group intervention for sexual minorities (Free2Be): a non-randomized mixed-method study for feasibility with exploratory analysis of effectiveness

Open access
Seabra, Daniel, Gato, Jorge, Petrocchi, Nicola, do Céu Salvador, Maria·2024·Mindfulness

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Despite sexual minority (SM), i.e. individuals who identify as lesbian women, gay men, bisexual, or pansexual, individuals presenting worse mental health outcomes when compared to heterosexual individuals, they face more difficulties in accessing affirmative and quality health services. This study is a mixed-method non-randomized single-arm trial targeting SM individuals assessing the feasibility and exploratory findings from an affirmative mindfulness, acceptance, and compassion-based group intervention (Free2Be). Method Eighteen participants who self-identified as SM, with a mean age of 30.80 years old, underwent a face-to-face group intervention with 13 weekly sessions (Free2Be). Feasibility was assessed in three domains (acceptability, practicality, and preliminary effectiveness) with self-report questionnaires and hetero-report interviews, during and after the intervention, and using a mixed-methods approach. Using a pre–post and participant-by-participant design, changes were assessed in self-reported internalized stigma, psychopathology indicators, and mindfulness, acceptance, and compassion processes. Results TheFree2Bewas acceptable and feasible in all three domains. Participants who completed the intervention (≥ 80% of attendance) revealed significant or reliable decreases in stress and social anxiety symptoms, self-criticism, and fear of compassion for the self. Conclusions The study provides evidence of the feasibility of the intervention. This affirmative mindfulness, acceptance, and compassion-based group intervention seems to be feasible and acceptable for SM individuals. These promising findings warrant further investigation within a pilot study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-024-02403-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a preliminary examination of a group intervention for sexual minority individuals combining elements of ACT and CFT, participants demonstrated reduced stress, social anxiety, self-criticism, and fear of compassion.

    “In a preliminary examination of a group intervention for sexual minority individuals combining elements of ACT and CFT, as well as other mindfulness-based interventions (Seabra et al., 2024), participants demonstrated reduced stress, social anxiety, self-criticism, and fear of compassion.”

    From Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of compassion-focused acceptance and commitment therapy delivered via telehealth in a community behavioral health clinic (2025) · cites this paper as Seabra et al., 2024

    The Method describes Free2Be as drawing on ACT, CFT, and other mindfulness-based techniques. The Results report decreases in all four outcomes among participants who completed the intervention, but the claim omits that restriction: non-completers showed no significant changes. Social anxiety and stress reductions were reliable for some completers, not significant group-level changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 11

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Germer, C., & Neff, K. (2019). Teaching the mindful self-compassion program: A guide for professionals. The Guilford Press.
  2. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  3. Jinpa, T. (2016). A fearless heart: How the courage to be compassionate can transform our lives. Hudson Strest Press.
  4. Pinto-Gouveia, J.; Salvador, M. C. The social interaction anxiety scale and the social fobia scale in the Portuguese population. In Proceedings of the 31st Congress of the European Association for Behaviour and Cognitive Therapy, Istanbul, Turkey, 2 June 2001.
  5. Simões, D. (2012). Medo da Compaixão: estudo das propriedad​es psicométri​cas da Fears of Compassion Scales (FCS) e estudo da sua relação com medidas de Vergonha, Compaixão e Psicopatol​ogia. [Master’s thesis] Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of University of Coimbra. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/23280
  6. Veiga, F. A. da, Andrade, J., Garrido, P., Neves, S., Madeira, N., Craveiro, A., Santos, J. C., & Saraiva, C. B. (2014). IRIS: A new tool for suicide risk assessment. Psiquiatria Clínica, 35(2), 65–72. http://rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt/handle/10400.4/1861

Authors
Seabra, D., Gato, J., Petrocchi, N., & do Céu Salvador, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • John Cabot University (IT)
Corresponding author
Seabra, Daniel
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2024-07
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1814-1830
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4400926834
Cited by
11
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/143437/2019)
  • Universidade de Coimbra
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
sexual minorities, affirmative therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, group intervention, feasibility, self-stigma, social anxiety, self-criticism, fear of compassion, access to mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review