Traditional Buddhist Mindfulness Versus Secular Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Residual Depressive Symptoms in Patients Treated for Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68
- Authors
- Baminiwatta, A., Hamamura, T., Madhubhashini, A., Dasanayaka, S., Dhananjaya, S., Chandradasa, M., & Van Dam, N. T.
- Affiliations
- Barwon Health (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- University of Kelaniya (LK)
- Corresponding author
- Baminiwatta, Anuradha
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2026-06-27
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2344-2358
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W7166293353
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, residual depressive symptoms, depressive disorders, non-inferiority, religiosity and spirituality, psychological well-being, self-compassion, group intervention, WHO-5 well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review