A review of diabetes prevention program translations: use of cultural adaptation and implementation research
Abstract
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) has been shown to prevent type 2 diabetes through lifestyle modification. The purpose of this study was to describe the literature on DPP translation, synthesizing studies using cultural adaptation and implementation research. A systematic search was conducted. Original studies evaluating DPP implementation and/or cultural adaptation were included. Data about cultural adaptation, implementation outcomes, and translation strategies was abstracted. A total of 44 were included, of which 15 reported cultural adaptations and 38 explored implementation. Many studies shortened the program length and reported a group format. The most commonly reported cultural adaptation (13 of 15) was with content. At the individual level, the most frequently assessed implementation outcome (n = 30) was adoption. Feasibility was most common (n = 32) at the organization level. The DPP is being tested in a variety of settings and populations, using numerous translational strategies and cultural adaptations. Implementation research that identifies, evaluates, and reports efforts to translate the DPP into practice is crucial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We know little about how best to adapt interventions to meet the needs of South Asian migrant populations with type 2 diabetes.
“We know little about how best to adapt interventions to meet the needs of South Asian migrant populations with T2D [44].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Tabak, R. G., Sinclair, K. A., Baumann, A. A., Racette, S. B., Sebert Kuhlmann, A., Johnson-Jennings, M. D., & Brownson, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tabak, Rachel G.
- Baumann, Ana A.
- Racette, Susan B.
- Johnson-Jennings, Michelle D.
- Brownson, Ross C.
- Venue
- Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-09-16
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-414
- ISSN
- 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6716
- OpenAlex
- W1610180429
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (R25 MH080916-01A2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (R25 MH080916-01A2)
- Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1TR000448)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1P30DK092950, U48DP001903)
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (R25 MH080916-01A2)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH080916, R25MH080916)
- National Cancer Institute
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092950)
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48-DP-001903)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007584)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- Diabetes Prevention Program, type 2 diabetes prevention, cultural adaptation, implementation research, program translation, lifestyle modification, implementation outcomes, program adoption, feasibility, content adaptation, group intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review