Cited by 14Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and Treatments

Mind the gap: Internet pornography exposure, influence and problematic viewing amongst emerging adults

Open access
Bernstein, Shireen, Warburton, Wayne, Bussey, Kay, Sweller, Naomi·2023·Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Characterised by both exploration and engagement in risky behaviours, late adolescence and emerging adulthood are periods of particular vulnerability to dysregulated behaviours. One such behaviour less well explored is that of problematic Internet pornography (IP) viewing, despite viewing explicit online material becoming increasingly pervasive and normative. Method In 2020, 385 (270 females, 110 males) Australian undergraduate students (aged 17–25 years) completed an online survey assessing exposure to IP, affective and cognitive responses to IP, IP-related sexual beliefs, self-assessed problematic IP viewing and key psychological vulnerability factors. Correlational and regression analyses were utilised to assess the relationships between variables. Results Most male (57.3%) and female (33.7%) respondents recalled their first exposure to IP as occurring between 12 and 14 years; however, 28.2% of males and 23.7% females recalled their exposure as occurring between 9 and 11 years, and a small proportion were exposed even earlier. Higher IP viewing frequency, positive affective responses to IP at current exposure, elevated sexual impulsivity and the endorsement of IP-related sexual beliefs were all found to be associated with self-assessed problematic IP viewing. Conclusions Findings suggest that both person and situational factors may contribute to problematic IP viewing patterns. IP viewing may also be shaping the sexual beliefs and behaviours of some viewers. Policy Implications There is little consensus on the factors that may lead IP viewing to become problematic, which limits the ability of clinicians to identify more susceptible individuals. These findings suggest that in addition to dysregulation factors such as sexual impulsivity, dissociation and depression, affective responses to IP and IP-related beliefs may also be important to consider when assessing for whom IP viewing may become problematic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13178-022-00698-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 14

Authors
Bernstein, S., Warburton, W., Bussey, K., & Sweller, N.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Shireen
Venue
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Published
2022-03-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
599-613
ISSN
  • 1553-6610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-9884
OpenAlex
W4214892218
Cited by
14
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sexuality Research and Social Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Macquarie University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
emerging adulthood, late adolescence, sexual impulsivity, sexual beliefs, psychological vulnerability, dissociation, depression, sexual risk behavior, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review