Mind the gap: Internet pornography exposure, influence and problematic viewing amongst emerging adults
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Introduction Characterised by both exploration and engagement in risky behaviours, late adolescence and emerging adulthood are periods of particular vulnerability to dysregulated behaviours. One such behaviour less well explored is that of problematic Internet pornography (IP) viewing, despite viewing explicit online material becoming increasingly pervasive and normative. Method In 2020, 385 (270 females, 110 males) Australian undergraduate students (aged 17–25 years) completed an online survey assessing exposure to IP, affective and cognitive responses to IP, IP-related sexual beliefs, self-assessed problematic IP viewing and key psychological vulnerability factors. Correlational and regression analyses were utilised to assess the relationships between variables. Results Most male (57.3%) and female (33.7%) respondents recalled their first exposure to IP as occurring between 12 and 14 years; however, 28.2% of males and 23.7% females recalled their exposure as occurring between 9 and 11 years, and a small proportion were exposed even earlier. Higher IP viewing frequency, positive affective responses to IP at current exposure, elevated sexual impulsivity and the endorsement of IP-related sexual beliefs were all found to be associated with self-assessed problematic IP viewing. Conclusions Findings suggest that both person and situational factors may contribute to problematic IP viewing patterns. IP viewing may also be shaping the sexual beliefs and behaviours of some viewers. Policy Implications There is little consensus on the factors that may lead IP viewing to become problematic, which limits the ability of clinicians to identify more susceptible individuals. These findings suggest that in addition to dysregulation factors such as sexual impulsivity, dissociation and depression, affective responses to IP and IP-related beliefs may also be important to consider when assessing for whom IP viewing may become problematic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
57.3% of boys reported first exposure to online pornography when aged 12-14, and 28.2% when aged 9-11.
“57.3% of boys reporting first exposure when aged 12 -14, and 28.2% when aged 9 -11 (Bernstein, Warburton, Bussey, & Sweller, 2023).”
From Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey (2024) · cites this paper as Bernstein, Warburton, Bussey, & Sweller, 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Bernstein, S., Warburton, W., Bussey, K., & Sweller, N.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bernstein, Shireen
- Venue
- Sexuality Research and Social Policy
- Published
- 2022-03-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 599-613
- ISSN
- 1553-6610 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-9884
- OpenAlex
- W4214892218
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sexuality Research and Social Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Macquarie University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- emerging adulthood, late adolescence, sexual impulsivity, sexual beliefs, psychological vulnerability, dissociation, depression, sexual risk behavior, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review