Knowledge and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening among women in Karnataka, India
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in India; however, participation in prevention and screening is low and the reasons for this are not well understood. In a cross-sectional survey in August 2008, 202 healthy women in Karnataka, India completed a questionnaire regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Factors associated with vaccination and Papanicolau (Pap) smear screening acceptance were explored. Thirty-six percent of women had heard of HPV while 15% had heard of cervical cancer. Five percent of women reported ever having a Pap smear, and 4% of women felt at risk of HPV infection. Forty-six percent of women were accepting of vaccination, but fewer (21%) were willing to have a Pap smear. Overall, knowledge related to HPV and cervical cancer topics was low. Women with negative attitudes toward HPV infection were 5.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-10) times more likely to accept vaccination but were not significantly more likely to accept Pap smear (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.0). Cost and a low level of perceived risk were the most frequent factors cited as potential barriers. Improving awareness of HPV and cervical cancer through health care providers in addition to increasing access to vaccination and screening through government-sponsored programs may be feasible and effective methods to reduce cervical cancer burden in India.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HPV vaccine acceptance in this rural Mysore population was higher than reported among parents in other regions of India (46-74%) and other south Asian countries (26.5-84.0%).
“There was a higher rate of HPV vaccine acceptance in this population as compared to that reported among parents in the other regions of India (Range: 46% to 74%) 13,14,22 and other countries in south Asia (Range: 26.5% to 84.0%).23-26”
From Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Acceptability among Parents of Adolescent Girls in a Rural Area, Mysore, India (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
Other barriers include cost, fear of side effects, perceived lack of need, and questions of vaccine efficacy.
“Other barriers include cost, fear of side effects, perceived lack of need, and questions of vaccine efficacy [24, 26].”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India
Diaz, M., Kim, J. J., Albero, G., de Sanjosé, S., Clifford, G., Bosch, F. X., & Goldie, S. J. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604462 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“and screening in India found that these strategies could be effective in reducing cancer burden by as much as 63 % and could prove to be a cost-effective health strategy for the country as a whole [11].”
Human papillomavirus infection among young adolescents in India: Impact of vaccination
Hussain, S., Bharadwaj, M., Nasare, V., Kumari, M., Sharma, S., Hedau, S., & Das, B. C. (2012) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.22261 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A study among female adolescents suggests that HPV 16 and 18 are also the most prevalent oncogenic strains in India [8].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Degarege, A., Krupp, K., Fennie, K., Srinivas, V., Li, T., Stephens, D. P., Marlow, L. A. V., Arun, A., & Madhivanan, P. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.008 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rehman, A., Srivastava, S., Garg, P., Garg, R., Kurian, K., Shumayla, S., Rathi, S. K., & Mehra, S. (2022) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4307 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W. (2022) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02019-y · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Coursey, K., Muralidhar, K., Srinivas, V., Jaykrishna, P., Begum, F., Ningaiah, N., Lee, S.-J., & Madhivanan, P. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19485-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Montgomery, M. P., Dune, T., Shetty, P. K., & Shetty, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
- Nitte University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Shetty, Avinash K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer Education
- Published
- 2014-10-31
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-137
- ISSN
- 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0154
- OpenAlex
- W2090160518
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, HPV vaccination, cervical cancer screening, Pap smear, vaccine acceptance, screening acceptance, knowledge, attitudes and practices, risk perception, cost barriers, women's health, Karnataka
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Perception, Prognosis, Women's Health, Risk Assessment, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review