The Effect of Educational Program Based on PRECEDE Model in Promoting Prostate Cancer Screening in a Sample of Iranian Men
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases among men. This study aimed to assess the effect of educational program based on Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational/Environmental Diagnosis and Evaluation (PRECEDE) model in promoting prostate cancer screening in a sample of Iranian men. This is a quasi-experimental study carried out on 300 men aged 40 to 70 (the subjects 150 experimental and 150 control groups) in Shiraz City, Fars Province, Iran, in 2016. The participants of the intervention group attended training based on the PRECEDE model. The study compared mean scores of knowledge, attitude, enabling factors, perceived social support, quality of life, general health, self-efficacy, and screening behaviors of the subjects before and 6 months after intervention in experimental and control groups. The mean age of experimental group was 56.45 ± 8.65, and the mean age of the control group was 55.64 ± 8.71 years (P = 0.521). The study showed that there was a significant increase in the mean score of knowledge, attitudes, perceived self-efficacy, enabling factors, perceived social support, quality of life, public health and screening behaviors of the experimental group; however, no significant change was observed in the mean score of knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, quality of life, general health, perceived social support, enabling factors, and screening behaviors of the control group. Our findings showed that the health education progra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The enablers finding was consistent with some studies and inconsistent with another.
“This finding was consistent with the results of studies conducted by Williams et al. [23], Jeihooni et al. [24], Dizagi et al. [26] and inconsistent with the results of the study conducted by Abedi et al. [27].”
From Effectiveness of educational intervention on women’s participation to cervical cancer screening: a quasi-experimental study based on PEN-3 model (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The significant increase in attitude in the intervention group is consistent with prior research.
“A significant increase in attitude in the intervention group is consistent with a body of research by Adamu et al. [20], Mirzaei-Alavijeh [19] and Jeihooni et al. [24].”
From Effectiveness of educational intervention on women’s participation to cervical cancer screening: a quasi-experimental study based on PEN-3 model (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The nurturers finding is consistent with some studies and inconsistent with another.
“This finding is consistent with a body of research by Williams et al. [23], Jeihooni et al. and Abedi et al. [24, 27], yet inconsistent with the results of the study by Mirtz et al. [28].”
From Effectiveness of educational intervention on women’s participation to cervical cancer screening: a quasi-experimental study based on PEN-3 model (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The behavior finding was in line with some studies and inconsistent with another.
“This finding was in line with the results of the studies conducted by Jeihooni et al. [24], Pirzadeh and Amidi Mazaheri [19], Romli et al. [30], Daryani et al. [31], yet inconsistent with the results of the study conducted by Adamu et al. [20].”
From Effectiveness of educational intervention on women’s participation to cervical cancer screening: a quasi-experimental study based on PEN-3 model (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Dizaji, M. B., Taghdisi, M. H., Solhi, M., Hoseini, S. M., Shafieyan, Z., Qorbani, M., Mansourian, M., Charkazi, A., & Rezapoor, A. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1186/2251-6581-13-72 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Seyrafi, N., Homayuni, A., Hosseini, Z., Aghamolaei, T., Ghanbarnejad, A., & Mouseli, A. (2022) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10331-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“[24, 27], yet inconsistent with the results of the study by Mirtz et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
- Authors
- Jeihooni, A. K., Kashfi, S. M., Hatami, M., Avand, A., & Bazrafshan, M.-R.
- Affiliations
- Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- University of Larestan (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Jeihooni, Ali Khani
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer Education
- Published
- 2017-09-14
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0154
- OpenAlex
- W2754486796
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fasa University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- prostate cancer screening, PRECEDE model, health education intervention, screening behavior, self-efficacy, perceived social support, enabling factors, health knowledge and attitudes, quality of life, men's health, Iranian men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Health Education, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Iran, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Self Care, Models, Educational, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
