Cited by 264Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Mentorship in Medicine and Other Health Professions

Henry-Noel, Nayanee, Bishop, Maria, Gwede, Clement K., Petkova, Ekaterina, Szumacher, Ewa·2019·Journal of Cancer Education

Abstract

Mentoring skills are valuable assets for academic medicine and allied health faculty, who influence and help shape the careers of the next generation of healthcare providers. Mentors are role models who also act as guides for students' personal and professional development over time. Mentors can be instrumental in conveying explicit academic knowledge required to master curriculum content. Importantly, they can enhance implicit knowledge about the "hidden curriculum" of professionalism, ethics, values, and the art of medicine not learned from texts. In many cases, mentors also provide emotional support and encouragement. It must be noted that to be an effective mentor, one must engage in ongoing learning in order to strengthen and further mentoring skills. Thus, learning communities can provide support, education, and personal development for the mentor. The relationship benefits mentors as well through greater productivity, career satisfaction, and personal gratification. Maximizing the satisfaction and productivity of such relationships entails self-awareness, focus, mutual respect, and explicit communication about the relationship. In this article, the authors describe the development of optimal mentoring relationships, emphasizing the importance of different approaches to mentorship, roles of the mentors and mentees, mentor and mentee benefits, interprofessional mentorships for teams, gender and mentorship, and culture and mentorship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13187-018-1360-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Henry-Noel, N., Bishop, M., Gwede, C. K., Petkova, E., & Szumacher, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Szumacher, Ewa
Venue
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
629-637
ISSN
  • 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0154
OpenAlex
W2802924006
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
mentoring, mentoring relationships, medical education, health professions education, hidden curriculum, professionalism, learning communities, organizational culture, faculty development, emotional support
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Communication, Faculty, Medical, Health Occupations, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Medicine, Mentors, Personal Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review