A Study on Knowledge and Awareness of Cervical Cancer Among Females of Rural and Urban Areas of Haryana, North India
Abstract
Lack of awareness of screening methods, risk factors, and symptoms may lead to late diagnosis and poor prognosis of cervical cancer. The plan of this study was to assess the level of awareness about cervical cancer and HPV vaccine among females of rural and urban areas of Haryana, India. This cross-sectional study was performed using a comprehensive self-designed questionnaire on 1500 women of urban (700) and rural (800) background aged 18-65 years, evaluating their knowledge for cervical cancer and screening, HPV infection and its preventive measure, and symptoms and risk factors. Data obtained was analyzed and interpreted by using simple percentages and bar charts. Most of the participants were aged between 21 and 30 years and had college level education. Majority of the women from rural areas had poor knowledge about cervical cancer (55%) and its screening (75%), HPV infection (87.5%), and HPV vaccine (95%) compared with urban areas. Knowledge about symptoms and risk factors was very low in both rural and urban areas. Whatever little knowledge the women had about cervical cancer was from college education, friends, neighbors, relatives, and medical practitioner or doctors. The survey pointed to the critical need to educate women about cervical cancer and its early diagnosis, related risk factors, symptoms, and preventive measures which can be achieved by launching extensive awareness programs for educating females about cervical cancer in India.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowledge is likely even poorer amongst less educated women and women from rural areas.
“Knowledge is likely even poorer amongst less educated women and women from rural areas [22–25].”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coursey, K., Muralidhar, K., Srinivas, V., Jaykrishna, P., Begum, F., Ningaiah, N., Lee, S.-J., & Madhivanan, P. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19485-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mishra, G. A., Pimple, S. A., Anand, K. V., Kulkarni, V. Y., Patil, A. S., & Biswas, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.35222 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kadian, L., Gulshan, G., Sharma, S., Kumari, I., Yadav, C., Nanda, S., & Yadav, R.
- Affiliations
- Maharshi Dayanand University (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Yadav, Ritu
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer Education
- Published
- 2020-02-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 844-849
- ISSN
- 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0154
- OpenAlex
- W3007754961
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, health knowledge, awareness, HPV vaccine, HPV infection, cervical cancer screening, risk factors, clinical symptoms, urban-rural differences, women's health education, Haryana
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review