Cited by 49Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

A Study on Knowledge and Awareness of Cervical Cancer Among Females of Rural and Urban Areas of Haryana, North India

Kadian, Lokesh, Gulshan, Gulshan, Sharma, Shivkant, Kumari, Indu, Yadav, Chetna, Nanda, Smiti, Yadav, Ritu·2021·Journal of Cancer Education

Abstract

Lack of awareness of screening methods, risk factors, and symptoms may lead to late diagnosis and poor prognosis of cervical cancer. The plan of this study was to assess the level of awareness about cervical cancer and HPV vaccine among females of rural and urban areas of Haryana, India. This cross-sectional study was performed using a comprehensive self-designed questionnaire on 1500 women of urban (700) and rural (800) background aged 18-65 years, evaluating their knowledge for cervical cancer and screening, HPV infection and its preventive measure, and symptoms and risk factors. Data obtained was analyzed and interpreted by using simple percentages and bar charts. Most of the participants were aged between 21 and 30 years and had college level education. Majority of the women from rural areas had poor knowledge about cervical cancer (55%) and its screening (75%), HPV infection (87.5%), and HPV vaccine (95%) compared with urban areas. Knowledge about symptoms and risk factors was very low in both rural and urban areas. Whatever little knowledge the women had about cervical cancer was from college education, friends, neighbors, relatives, and medical practitioner or doctors. The survey pointed to the critical need to educate women about cervical cancer and its early diagnosis, related risk factors, symptoms, and preventive measures which can be achieved by launching extensive awareness programs for educating females about cervical cancer in India.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13187-020-01712-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kadian, L., Gulshan, G., Sharma, S., Kumari, I., Yadav, C., Nanda, S., & Yadav, R.
Affiliations
  • Maharshi Dayanand University (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
  • Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Yadav, Ritu
Venue
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2020-02-28
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
844-849
ISSN
  • 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0154
OpenAlex
W3007754961
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer, health knowledge, awareness, HPV vaccine, HPV infection, cervical cancer screening, risk factors, clinical symptoms, urban-rural differences, women's health education, Haryana
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review