Cited by 15Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Managementmelanin and skin pigmentationInnovations in Medical Education

Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: The Gap Between the Knowledge of General Practitioners and Dermatologists in a Brazilian Population

Garrido, Andrea Quadros, Wainstein, Alberto Julius Alves, Brandão, Marina Patrus Ananias, de Vasconcellos Santos, Fernando Augusto, Bittencourt, Flavia Vasques, Ledsham, Carolina, Drummond-Lage, Ana Paula·2020·Journal of Cancer Education

Abstract

The early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma provides less aggressive treatment reducing mortality. General practitioners are responsible for cancer diagnoses in the Brazilian Public Health System and therefore play a crucial role in the prevention and early detection of melanoma. To assess the melanoma knowledge of a primary healthcare physician, the general practitioner, compared to a dermatologist. General practitioners and dermatologists answered a questionnaire about melanoma and the management of suspected cases. The results of both groups were compared. The sample consisted of 80 specialists and 160 general practitioners. When asked about the "ABCDE" rule, 96.2% of the dermatologists knew about it, compared to 34.4% of the general practitioners. The percentage of dermatologists who examined the whole skin of the patient at high risk for melanoma was 90% vs. 24.5% amongst general practitioners. The most cited reasons for the absence of the examination of patients at risk for melanoma were lack of time at the consultations (17.6% specialists, 66.1% generalists) and an excessive number of patients (17.6% specialists, 61.5% generalists). General practitioner has less knowledge about melanoma compared to the dermatologists and presents deficient behaviors about patients at risk or who have suspicious lesions, indicating the need for training and continuing education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13187-020-01735-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specialists who are more familiar with disease-specific diagnostic guidelines may conduct more comprehensive examinations and may detect disease at an earlier stage.

    “specialists who are more familiar with disease-specific diagnostic guidelines may conduct more comprehensive examinations and may detect disease at an earlier stage [87].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 15

Authors
Garrido, A. Q., Wainstein, A. J. A., Brandão, M. P. A., de Vasconcellos Santos, F. A., Bittencourt, F. V., Ledsham, C., & Drummond-Lage, A. P.
Affiliations
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
819-825
ISSN
  • 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0154
OpenAlex
W4244634978
Cited by
15
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
cutaneous melanoma, early diagnosis, general practitioners, dermatologists, physician knowledge, ABCDE rule, skin assessment, primary care, continuing medical education, Brazilian public health system
MeSH terms
Dermatologists, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma, Adult, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Melanoma, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Skin Neoplasms, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review