Cited by 6Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Resection of isolated port site metastasis in gall bladder cancers-careful selection and perioperative systemic therapy may improve outcomes

Open access
Agarwala, Vivek, Ramaswamy, Anant, Dsouza, Sanyo, Pande, Nikhil, Goel, Mahesh, Patkar, Shraddha, Ostwal, Vikas·2018·Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Excision of port site (PSE) for patients having undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is not a standard recommendation. We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of patients with isolated PSM without any prior cancer-directed therapy who were assessed for resection between March 2012 and July 2016 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. Eleven of a total 13 patients underwent wide excision for PSM in the given time period. Upfront resection was undertaken in six patients while seven patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and two received neoadjuvant chemo radiotherapy (NACTRT) prior to attempted resection. With the median follow-up of 22 months, post PSM disease-free survival (DFS) was 20 months (95% CI 15-24 months) and overall survival (OS) was 37 months (95% CI 22-51 months). Careful selection along with an aggressive management strategy may be a step forward in the treatment of patients with isolated PSM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13193-018-0809-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a retrospective analysis of patients with solitary port-site metastasis, median overall survival was 37 months and post-port-site-metastasis disease-free survival was 20 months, with a median follow-up of 22 months.

    “Overall survival (OS) was 37 months, and post-PSM disease-free survival (DFS) was 20 months, with a median follow-up of 22 months.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 6

Authors
Agarwala, V., Ramaswamy, A., Dsouza, S., Pande, N., Goel, M., Patkar, S., & Ostwal, V.
Affiliations
Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Ostwal, Vikas
Venue
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
427-431
ISSN
  • 0975-7651 (ISSN-L)
  • 0976-6952
OpenAlex
W2886077939
Cited by
6
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
port-site metastasis, gallbladder cancer, surgical resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, perioperative systemic therapy, disease-free survival, overall survival, patient selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review