Cited by 51Meat and Animal Product QualityPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Comparative antioxidant effect of BHT and water extracts of banana and sapodilla peels in raw poultry meat

Open access
Devatkal, Suresh K., Kumboj, Ritu, Paul, Devosmita·2014·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Antioxidant properties of banana (Musa paradisiaca) and Sapodilla/Chikoo (Manilkara zapota) peel extracts in chicken patties were evaluated. Four treatments viz., I. Control (meat + 2% salt), II.BHT (meat + 2% salt + 0.1% BHT), III. BPE (meat + 2% salt + 2% banana peel extract) and IV. SPE (meat + 2% salt + 2% sapodilla/chikoo peel extract) were compared for changes in colour and lipid oxidation during 8 days refrigerated storage (4 ± °C). The average phenolic content was 550.2 and 550.8 mg gallic acid equivalent per 10 g peel in BPE and SPE respectively. Free radical scavenging activity was 66.9 and 67.8% in BPE and SPE respectively. Banana peel extract had significantly (P < 0.05) higher reducing activity (1.6) as compared to sapodilla peel extract (0.91). During refrigerated storage period, all color parameters decreased significantly in all treatments. Observation on lipid oxidation showed a significantly (P < 0.05) higher TBARS values in control than other three treatments. The increase in TBARS from initial day of storage to last day of storage was highest in control (514.3%) as compared to BHT (387.7%), BPE (370.6%) and SPE (383.7%). Both synthetic antioxidants and natural extracts significantly decreased the TBARS. The average decrease in TBARS values during 8 days of storage was 56.8%, 38.3% and 37.2% values in BHT, BPE and SPE treatments respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that water extracts obtained from banana and sapodilla peels could be explored as natural antioxidants in poultry meat and meat products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-011-0508-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The preservative potential of the mentioned extracts has been proven to be similar to synthetic preservatives like butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA).

    “The preservative potential of the mentioned extracts has been proven to be similar to synthetic preservatives like butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) [118,119].”

    From Potential Valorization of Banana Production Waste in Developing Countries: Bio-Engineering Aspects (2024) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Results and discussion and Conclusion (article pp. 387–391) report that banana and sapodilla peel extracts reduced lipid oxidation in refrigerated chicken meat, with an antioxidant effect comparable to BHT. BHA is mentioned in the Introduction as a synthetic antioxidant, but the study did not compare the extracts with BHA, so that part of the claim is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hunter RS, Harold RW (1987) The measurement of appearance. Wiley, New York

Authors
Devatkal, S. K., Kumboj, R., & Paul, D.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Devatkal, Suresh K.
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2011-09-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
387-391
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2020377705
Cited by
51
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
banana peel extract, natural antioxidants, butylated hydroxytoluene, chicken patties, lipid oxidation, TBARS, meat color, phenolic content, free radical scavenging, cold storage, meat products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review