Ultrasound-assisted extraction process of phenolic antioxidants from Olive leaves: A nutraceutical study using RSM and LC–ESI–DAD–MS
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, there has been an ever growing interest in finding new natural s ources of food antioxidants. As a main fruit crop, olive is also valued due to its phenolic-containing leaves. Mathematically based optimization methods are used as powerful tools to extract different antioxidant compounds. The present study is aimed to provide an efficient extraction method for total phenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant ability (DPPH scavenging assay and FRAP). The effects of ultrasonic temperature (35-65 °C), ultrasonic time (5-15 min), and ethanol to water ratio (Et: W) (25-75%) were evaluated. Second-order polynomial models were used through a rotatable Box-Behnken design (BBD) consisting of 15 experimental runs with three replicates at the center point. Interactional effects of the studied factors were significant in most cases for all responses. The highest extraction efficiency was found to be fifty-one percent of ethanol (65 °C, 15 min) to water ratio. Under optimal conditions, values for TPC, TFC, DPPHsc and FRAP assay were 183.4 (mg GAE. g-1 DW), 696.77 (mg Quercetin. g-1 DW), 78.98 (DPPHsc %) and 1942 µmol Fe+2/g DW, respectively. R2 values (R2 > 0.92) showed that RSM models could efficiently predict the yield of all responses. In the LC-ESI-MS-DAD profiling of the optimized extract, 27 compounds were identified with oleuropein as the main compound. In the present study, olive leaf is introduced as a promising source of natural antioxidant and can be used in food industries following further studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ultrasound extraction is a method highly efficient, requiring shorter extraction time when compared with other methods.
“Shirzad and coworkers [40] studied the effect of different parameters (extraction time, temperature, ethanol-water ratio) in order to optimize ultrasound-assisted extraction of O. europaea leaves and concluded that ultrasound extraction is a method highly efficient, requiring shorter extraction time when compared with other methods.”
From Comparison of Techniques and Solvents on the Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential of Extracts from Acacia dealbata and Olea europaea (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- J Food Sci Technol (July 2017) 54(8):2361-2371 2371
- Authors
- Shirzad, H., Niknam, V., Taheri, M., & Ebrahimzadeh, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Tehran (IR)
- Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Niknam, Vahid
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science and Technology
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2361-2371
- ISSN
- 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
- 0975-8402
- PMC
- PMC5502029
- OpenAlex
- W2680015296
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Tehran
- Urmia University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Keywords
- olive leaves, phenolic antioxidants, ultrasound-assisted extraction, extraction optimization, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP reducing power, oleuropein, ethanol/water ratio, Box-Behnken design, nutraceuticals, natural food antioxidants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review