Cited by 79Water Quality and Pollution AssessmentWater Quality and Resources StudiesGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water quality assessment of carbonate aquifers in southern Latium region, Central Italy: a case study for irrigation and drinking purposes

Open access
Sappa, Giuseppe, Ergul, Sibel, Ferranti, Flavia·2014·Applied Water Science

Abstract

In southern Latium region, Central Italy, groundwater and spring water resources in the carbonate aquifers are the major contributors of drinking and irrigation water supply. The aim of this study was to review hydrochemical processes that control the groundwater chemistry and to determine the suitability of springs and groundwater for irrigation and drinking purposes on the basis of the water quality indices. Physical (pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids) and hydrochemical characteristics (Na + , K + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , HCO 3 − , Cl − , and SO 4 − ) of springs and groundwater were determined. To assess the water quality, chemical parameters like sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), total hardness, Mg-hazard (MH), sodium percentage (Na %), salinity hazard, permeability index, and Kelly’s ratio were calculated based on the analytical results. A Durov diagram plot revealed that the groundwater has been evolved from Ca to HCO 3 recharge water, followed by mixing and reverse ion exchange processes, due to the respective dominance of Na–Cl and Ca–Cl water types. According to Gibbs’s diagram plots, chemical weathering of rock forming minerals is the major driving force controlling water chemistry in this area. Groundwater and spring samples were grouped into six categories according to irrigation water quality assessment diagram of US Salinity Laboratory classification and most of the water samples distributed in category C2–S1 and C3–S1 highlighting medium to high salinity hazard and low sodium content class. The results of hydrochemical analyses and the calculated water quality parameters suggest that most of the water samples are suitable for irrigation and drinking purposes, except for the samples influenced by seawater and enhanced water–rock interaction. High values of salinity, Na %, SAR, and MH at certain sites, restrict the suitability for agricultural uses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13201-013-0135-9

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Celico P (1978) Schema idrogeologico dell’Appennino carbonatico centro-meridionale. Memorie e Note dell’Istituto di Geologia Applicata, Napoli 14:1–97
  2. Kirda C (1997) Assessment of irrigation water quality. Options Mediterr 31:367–377
  3. Paliwal KV (1967) Effect of gypsum application on the quality of irrigation waters. Madras Agric J 59:646–647
  4. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural handbook 60. USDA and IBH Pub. Coy Ltd., New Delhi, pp 98–99
  5. Szabolcs I, Darab C (1964) The influence of irrigation water of high sodium carbonate content of soils. In: Proceedings of 8th international congress of ISSS, transmission, vol 2. pp 803–812
  6. WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality (3rd edn). Recommendations, vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva
  7. WHO (2006) Guideline for drinking water quality. Vol. recommendations. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Sappa, G., Ergul, S., & Ferranti, F.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Sappa, Giuseppe
Venue
Applied Water Science
Published
2013-10-24
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
115-128
ISSN
  • 2190-5487 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5495
OpenAlex
W2155771760
Cited by
79
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Water Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Keywords
carbonate aquifers, groundwater quality, spring water, irrigation water suitability, drinking water suitability, water chemistry, water quality index, sodium adsorption ratio, salinity hazard, magnesium hazard, chemical weathering, saltwater intrusion, water-rock interaction, Durov diagram, Gibbs diagram, Latium region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water quality assessment of carbonate aquifers in southern Latium region, Central Italy: a case study for irrigation and drinking purposes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13201-013-0135-9
The paper
Sappa, G., Ergul, S., & Ferranti, F. (2014). Water quality assessment of carbonate aquifers in southern Latium region, Central Italy: a case study for irrigation and drinking purposes. Applied Water Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0135-9