CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of fluoride contaminations in groundwater of hard rock aquifers in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu (India)

Thivya, C., Chidambaram, S., Rao, M. S., Thilagavathi, R., Prasanna, M. V., Manikandan, S.·2017·Applied Water Science
DOI 10.1007/s13201-015-0312-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13201-015-0312-0

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Study area map with lithology and sampling points
Fig. 1 Study area map with lithology and sampling pointsCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Water level map of the study area (in meters above mean sea level)
Fig. 2 Water level map of the study area (in meters above mean sea level)CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Box and Whisker plot for groundwater samples
Fig. 3 Box and Whisker plot for groundwater samplesCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Fluoride concentration in groundwater samples with respect to lithology
Fig. 4 Fluoride concentration in groundwater samples with respect to lithologyCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Spatial distribution of fluoride ions in groundwater samples
Fig. 5 Spatial distribution of fluoride ions in groundwater samplesCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 Fluoride vs. EC diagram for groundwater samples
Fig. 7 Fluoride vs. EC diagram for groundwater samplesCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 9 Plot for d 18 O versus d D of groundwater samples compared with GMWL and LMWL
Fig. 9 Plot for d 18 O versus d D of groundwater samples compared with GMWL and LMWLCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 8 Fluoride vs. HCO3 diagram for groundwater samples
Fig. 8 Fluoride vs. HCO3 diagram for groundwater samplesCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 11 a -d Spatial distribution of factor scores 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively
Fig. 11 a -d Spatial distribution of factor scores 1, 2, 3, 4, respectivelyCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Abu-Zeid KM (1998) Recent trends and development: reuse of waste water in agriculture. Environ Manag Health J 9(2–3):79–89 · DOI
  2. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 19th edn. APHA, Washington DC, USASS
  3. Baiju KR (2006) Metamorphism and fluid inclusion studies of charnockites and associated rocks from the Madurai granulite block, southern India with special reference to graphite mineralization. Published thesis Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala
  4. CGWB (2007) Central groundwater board. District Groundwater Brochure, Madurai district
  5. CGWB (2010) Central groundwater board. District Groundwater Brochure, Sivaganga district
  6. Chidambaram S (2000) Hydrogeochemical studies of groundwater in Periyar district, Tamilnadu, India, Un Published Ph.D thesis, Department of Geology, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India
  7. Chidambaram S, Prasanna MV, Vasu K (2007) Study on stable isotopic signatures in ground water of Gadilam river basin, Tamilnadu India. Indian J Geochem 22(2):209–221
  8. Chidambaram S, Bala Krishna Prasad M, Manivannan R, Karmegam U, Singaraja C, Anandhan P, Prasanna MV, Manikandan S (2013) Environmental hydrogeochemistry and genesis of fluoride in groundwaters of Dindigul district, Tamilnadu (India). Environ Earth Sci 68:333–342. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1741-9 · DOI
  9. Chouhan S, Flora SJS (2010) Arsenic and fluoride: two major groundwater pollutants. Indian J Exp Biol 48:666–678
  10. Datta AS, Chakrabortty A, De Dalal SS, Lahiri SC (2014) Fluoride contamination of underground water in west Bengal, India. Research report. Fluoride 47(3):241–248
  11. Gupta S, Mondal D, Bardhan A (2012) Geochemical provenance and spatial distribution of fluoride in Groundwater in parts of Raniganj coal field, West Bengal, India Scholars Research Library. Arch Appl Sci Res 4(1):292–306
  12. Handa BK (1975) Geochemistry and genesis of fluoride containing groundwater in India. Ground Water 13:275–281 · DOI
  13. Harvey CF (2005) Groundwater arsenic contamination on the Ganges Delta: biogeochemistry, hydrology, human perturbations, and human suffering on a large scale. C R Geosci 337(1–2):285–296 · DOI
  14. Jacks G, Bhattacharya P, Chaudhary V, Singh KP (2005) Controls on the genesis of some high-fluoride groundwaters in India. Appl Geochem 20:221–228 · DOI
  15. Liu CW, Lin KH, Kuo YM (2003) Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a Blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 313:77–89 · DOI
  16. Loganathan P, Gray CW, Hedley MJ, Roberts AHC (2006) Total and soluble fluorine concentrations in relation to properties of soils in New Zealand. Eur J Soil Sci 57:411–421 · DOI
  17. Mameri N, Yeddou AR, Lounici H, Grib H, Belhocine D, Bariou B (1998) Defluoridation of septentrional Sahara water of North Africa by electrocoagulation process using bipolar aluminium electrodes. Water Res 32(5):1604–1610 · DOI
  18. Manikandan S (2014) A study on the Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater in Krishnagiri district with special reference to Fluoride ions, Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India
  19. Manikandan S, Chidambaram S, Ramanathan AL, Prasanna MV, Karmegam U, Singaraja C, Paramaguru P, Jainab I (2012) A study on the high fluoride concentration in the magnesium-rich water of hard rock aquifer in Krishnagiri district, Tamilnadu, India. Arab J Geosci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0752-x · DOI
  20. Manivannan R (2010) Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater in Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu, India. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Annamalai University
  21. Manivannan R, Chidambaram S, Karmegam U, Anandhan P, Manikandan S, Hameed Shahul (2012) Mapping of fluoride ions in groundwater of Dindigul district, Tamilnadu, India—using GIS technique. Arab J Geosci 5:433–439. doi: 10.1007/s12517-010-0216-0 · DOI
  22. Olobaniyi SB, Owoyemi FB (2006) Characterization by factor analysis of the chemical facies of groundwater in the deltaic plain-sands aquifer of Warri, Western Niger Delta Nigeria. Afr J Sci Techol 7(1):73–81
  23. Prasanna MV, Chidambaram S, Srinivasamoorthy K, Anandhan P, John peter A, Senthil Kumar G (2008) Evaluation of mechanisms controlling hydrogeochemical nature of groundwater in Gadilam river basin, Tamilnadu, India. Icfai J Earth Sci 2(1):47–60
  24. Ramanathan S (1956) Ultrabasic rock of salem and Dodkanya and their relationship with Charnockite. Published Ph.D thesis, University of Madras
  25. Ramesh R, Anbu R (1996) Chemical methods for environmental analysis—water and sediments. Groundwater 27:835–847
  26. Ramesh M, Dharmaraj E, Jose B, Ravindra Raj (2012) Physico-chemical characteristics of ground water of Manachanallur Block Trichy, Tamilnadu, India. Adv Appl Sci Res 3(3):1709–1713
  27. Ranjana UKP, Champa Naverathna M (2011) river sand mining in southern Sri-Lanka and its effect on environment. In: 11th International River symposium on “A Future of Extremes” Brisbane, Australia, 2008
  28. Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Sukhija BS, Reddy AGS, Smedley PL (2010) Fluoride dynamics in the granitic aquifer of the Wailapally watershed, Nalgonda district, India. Chem Geol 269:278–289 · DOI
  29. Ripa LW (1993) A half-century of community water fluoridation in the United States: review and commentary. J Public Health Dent 53:17–44 · DOI
  30. Sankar K (2002) Evaluation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing data in upper Vaigai river basin, Tamil Nadu. India. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing 30(3):119–129 · DOI
  31. Saxena VK, Ahmed S (2001) Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water–rock interaction study. Environ Geol 40(8):1084–1087 · DOI
  32. Saxena U, Saxena S (2014) Ground water quality evaluation with special reference to Fluoride and Nitrate contamination in Bassi Tehsil of district Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Int J Environ Sci 5(1):145
  33. Singaraja C, Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Prasanna MV, Thivya C, Thilagavathi R (2012) A study on the status of fluoride ion in groundwater of coastal hard rock aquifers of south India. Arab J Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0675-6 · DOI
  34. Srikantappa C, Raith M, Spiering B (1985) Progressive charnockitization of a leptynite-khondalite suite in southern Kerala, India-evidence for formation of charnockites through decrease in fluid pressure. J Geol Soc India 26:849–872 · DOI
  35. Srinivasamoorthy K, Chidambaram S, Vasanthavigar M (2008) Geochemistry of fluorides in groundwater: Salem district, Tamilnadu, India. J Environ Hydrol 16(25):1–10
  36. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York
  37. Subbarao (2003) Groundwater quality: focus on fluoride concentration in rural parts of Guntur districts, Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrol Sci J 48(5):835–847 · DOI
  38. Susheela AK (1993) A treatise on Fluorosis, 2nd edn. Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation, New Delhi
  39. Thivya C, Chidambaram S, Singaraja C, Thilagavathi R, Prasanna MV, Jainab I (2013a) A study on the significance of lithology in groundwater quality of Madurai district, Tamil Nadu (India). Environ Dev Sustain. doi: 10.1007/s10668-013-9439-z · DOI
  40. Thivya C, Chidambaram S, Thilagavathi R, Prasanna MV, Singaraja C, Nepolian M, Sundarrajan M (2013b) Identification of the geochemical processes in groundwater by factor analysis in hard rock aquifers of Madurai district. Arab J Geosci, South India. doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1065-4 · DOI
  41. Tirumalesh K, Shivanna K, Jalihal AA (2007) Isotope hydrochemical approach to understand fluoride release into groundwaters of Ilkal area, Bagalkot District, Karnataka, India. Hydrogeol J 15:589–598 · DOI
  42. Umarani P, Ramu A (2014) Fluoride contamination status of groundwater in east coastal area in Tamilnadu, India. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3(3):10045–10051
  43. Yadav AK, Khan P (2010) Fluoride and fluorosis status in groundwater of Todaraisingh Area of District Tonk Rajasthan, India: a case study. Int J Chem Environ Pharmaceut Res 1(1):6–11
  44. Yidana SM, Ophori D, Yakubo BB, Samed AA (2012) Factor model to explain the hydrochemistry and causes of fluoride enrichment in groundwater from the middle voltaian sedimentary aquifers in the northern region, Ghana. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 7(1):50–68
  45. Zhang B, Hon M, Zhao YS, Lin XY, Zhang XL, Dong J (2003) Distribution and risk assessment of fluoride in drinking water in the west plain region of Jilin province, China. Environ Geochem Health 25:421–431 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thivya, C., Chidambaram, S., Rao, M. S., Thilagavathi, R., Prasanna, M. V., & Manikandan, S.
Venue
Applied Water Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
1011-1023
ISSN
  • 2190-5487
  • 2190-5495
DOI
10.1007/s13201-015-0312-0
Cited by
64
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)
Funders
University Grants Commission (UGC), India (F: 39-143/2010 (SR))

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review