Screening for potential probiotic from spontaneously fermented non-dairy foods based on in vitro probiotic and safety properties
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to screen potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from Chinese spontaneously fermented non-dairy foods by evaluating their probiotic and safety properties. All lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The in vitro probiotic tests included survival under low pH and bile salts, cell surface hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, co-aggregation, antibacterial activity, and adherence ability to cells. The safety properties were evaluated based on hemolytic activity and antibiotic resistance profile. The salt tolerance, growth in litmus milk, and acidification ability were examined on selected potential probiotic LAB strains to investigate their potential use in food fermentation. A total of 122 strains were isolated and identified at the species level by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and included 62 Lactobacillus plantarum, 40 Weissella cibaria, 12 Lactobacillus brevis, 6 Weissella confusa, and 2 Lactobacillus sakei strains. One W. cibaria and nine L. plantarum isolates were selected based on their tolerance to low pH and bile salts. The hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, co-aggregation, and antagonistic activities of these isolates varied greatly. All of the 10 selected strains showed multiple antibiotic resistance phenotypes and no hemolytic activity. The highest adhesion capacity to SW480 cells was observed with L. plantarum SK1. The isolates L. plantarum SK1, CB9, and CB10 were the most similar strains to Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and selected for their high salt tolerance and acidifying activity. The results revealed strain-specific probiotic properties were and potential probiotics that can be used in the food industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 11 bacterial isolates were not virulent and were safe for further consideration as beneficial probiotics.
“indicating that these isolates were not virulent and were safe for further consideration as beneficial probiotics [45,46].”
From Bioprophylactic potential of novel human colostrum probiotics via apoptotic induction of colon cancer cells and cell immune activation (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Wang, J., Wang, J., Yang, K., Liu, M., Zhang, J., Wei, X., & Fan, M.
- Affiliations
- Northwest A&F University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wei, Xinyuan
- Fan, Mingtao
- Venue
- Annals of Microbiology
- Published
- 2018-11-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 803-813
- ISSN
- 0003-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 1590-4261
- 1869-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2899019340
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Annals of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Ministry of Agriculture of Peoples’ Republic of China (201503142-10)
- The Department of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province, China (2016NY-148, 2016KTCQ02-13)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- probiotics, lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus plantarum, Weissella cibaria, Weissella confusa, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus sakei, acid resistance, bile salt tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, self-aggregation, co-aggregation, antibacterial activity, cell adhesion, hemolytic activity, antibiotic resistance, salt tolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review