The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species clarification of the prize medicinal Ganoderma mushroom “Lingzhi”
Abstract
“Lingzhi” is a mushroom that has been renowned in China for more than 2,000 years because of its claimed medicinal properties plus its symbolic fortune. “Lingzhi” has high economic value mostly as a dietary supplement in the modern market especially in East Asia, and its medicinal functions have become a hot study topic. For over a century, the highly prized medicinal fungus, known as “Lingzhi” in East Asia, has been assigned to Ganoderma lucidum , a species originally described from Europe. Molecular studies in recent years have revealed that the commercially cultivated ‘ G. lucidum ’ (“Lingzhi”) in East Asia is a different species from the true G. lucidum . The present study aims to clarify the species identity of “Lingzhi” based on morphological studies and analysis of rDNA nuc-ITS sequences, and additional gene fragments of mt-SSU, RPB1, RPB2, and TEF1-α of “Lingzhi” were provided. All Ganoderma species that mostly resemble “Lingzhi” in phylogeny and /or morphology were included for analysis. We propose a new species G. lingzhi for “Lingzhi”, which has an East Asia distribution. The most striking characteristics which differentiate G. lingzhi from G. lucidum are the presence of melanoid bands in the context, a yellow pore surface and thick dissepiments (80–120 μm) at maturity. G. curtisii is most closely related to G. lingzhi in phylogeny and is from North America. Ganoderma flexipes , G. multipileum, G. sichuanense , G. tropicum and ‘ G. tsugae ’ , are also closely related with G. lingzhi and are reported from China. These species are compared and discussed. ‘ Ganoderma tsuage ’ reported from China is determined as conspecific with G. lucidum , hence the distribution of G. lucidum extends from Europe to northeastern China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationResource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: edible, medicinal and poisonous species
Wu, F., Zhou, L.-W., Yang, Z.-L., Bau, T., Li, T.-H., & Dai, Y.-C. (2019) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-019-00432-7 · Cited by 394
Self-citationJayawardena, R. S., Hyde, K. D., Chen, Y. J., Papp, V., Palla, B., Papp, D., Bhunjun, C. S., Hurdeal, V. G., Senwanna, C., Manawasinghe, I. S., et al. (2020) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00460-8 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, Y., Wu, S.-H., & Dai, Y.-C.
- Venue
- Fungal Diversity
- Publisher
- BioAcademic Press
- Published
- 2012-06-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 1560-2745 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2079675317
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species clarification of the prize medicinal Ganoderma mushroom “Lingzhi”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13225-012-0178-5
- The paper
- Cao, Y., Wu, S.-H., & Dai, Y.-C. (2012). Species clarification of the prize medicinal Ganoderma mushroom “Lingzhi”. Fungal Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0178-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.