Irradiation induces glioblastoma cell senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and fatal primary brain tumors in humans. The standard therapy for the treatment of GBM is surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. However, the frequency of tumor recurrence in GBM patients is very high, and the survival rate remains poor. Delineating the mechanisms of GBM recurrence is essential for therapeutic advances. Here, we demonstrate that irradiation rendered 17-20 % of GBM cells dead, but resulted in 60-80 % of GBM cells growth-arrested with increases in senescence markers, such as senescence-associated beta-galactosidase-positive cells, H3K9me3-positive cells, and p53-p21(CIP1)-positive cells. Moreover, irradiation induced expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) mRNAs and NFκB transcriptional activity in GBM cells. Strikingly, compared to injection of non-irradiated GBM cells into immune-deficient mice, the co-injection of irradiated and non-irradiated GBM cells resulted in faster growth of tumors with the histological features of human GBM. Taken together, our findings suggest that the increases in senescent cells and SASP in GBM cells after irradiation is likely one of main reasons for tumor recurrence in post-radiotherapy GBM patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-injection of senescent fibroblasts increases tumourigenicity in xenograft models, including primary breast cancer tissues.
“These in vitro observations have been further substantiated in vivo, where co-injection of senescent fibroblasts has been shown to increase tumourigenicity in xenograft models, including primary breast cancer tissues.26,45–47”
From Paracrine roles of cellular senescence in promoting tumourigenesis (2018) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Jeon, H.-Y., Kim, J.-K., Ham, S. W., Oh, S.-Y., Kim, J., Park, J.-B., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, S.-C., & Kim, H.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Hallym University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Sung-Chan
- Kim, Hyunggee
- Venue
- Tumor Biology
- Published
- 2015-11-19
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5857-5867
- ISSN
- 1010-4283 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0380
- OpenAlex
- W2202164295
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Tumor Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (KR) (2013M2A2A7042530)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, radiotherapy, cellular senescence, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, tumor recurrence, NF-κB, p53/p21 pathway, H3K9me3, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, growth arrest
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Cycle, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Glioblastoma, Humans, Phenotype, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, NF-kappa B, Cellular Senescence, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Heterografts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review