The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing digital propaganda and conflict rhetoric: a study on Russia’s bot-driven campaigns and counter-narratives during the Ukraine crisis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The dissemination of disinformation has become a formidable weapon, with nation-states exploiting social media platforms to engineer narratives favorable to their geopolitical interests. This study delved into Russia’s orchestrated disinformation campaign, in three times periods of the 2022 Russian-Ukraine War: its incursion, its midpoint and the Ukrainian Kherson counteroffensive. This period is marked by a sophisticated blend of bot-driven strategies to mold online discourse. Utilizing a dataset derived from Twitter, the research examines how Russia leveraged automated agents to advance its political narrative, shedding light on the global implications of such digital warfare and the swift emergence of counter-narratives to thwart the disinformation campaign. This paper introduces a methodological framework that adopts a multiple-analysis model approach, initially harnessing unsupervised learning techniques, with TweetBERT for topic modeling, to dissect disinformation dissemination within the dataset. Utilizing Moral Foundation Theory and the BEND Framework, this paper dissects social-cyber interactions in maneuver warfare, thereby understanding the evolution of bot tactics employed by Russia and its counterparts within the Russian-Ukraine crisis. The findings highlight the instrumental role of bots in amplifying political narratives and manipulating public opinion, with distinct strategies in narrative and community maneuvers identified through the BEND framework. Moral Foundation Theory reveals how moral justifications were embedded in these narratives, showcasing the complexity of digital propaganda and its impact on public perception and geopolitical dynamics. The study shows how pro-Russian bots were used to foster a narrative of protection and necessity, thereby seeking to legitimize Russia’s actions in Ukraine whilst degrading both NATO and Ukraine’s actions. Simultaneously, the study explores the resilient counter-narratives of pro-Ukraine forces, revealing their strategic use of social media platforms to counteract Russian disinformation, foster global solidarity, and uphold democratic narratives. These efforts highlight the emerging role of social media as a digital battleground for narrative supremacy, where both sides leverage information warfare tactics to sway public opinion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AI systems could analyze how adversaries’ disinformation spreads across modern media and social networks (Cinelli et al., 2022; Marigliano et al., 2024; Pacheco et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021), allowing our defense and security policymakers to respond faster and more effectively.”
From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Marigliano et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
Eady, G., Paskhalis, T., Zilinsky, J., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9 · Cited by 125
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Adrian K (2021) Moral and political foundations: from political psychology to political realism. Moral Philos Politics 10(1):139–159
- Alieva I, Ng LH, Carley KM (2022) Investigating the spread of Russian disinformation about biolabs in Ukraine on twitter using social network analysis. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 1770–1775. IEEE · DOI
- Carley Kathleen M (2020) An emerging science: social cybersecurity. Comput Math Organ Theory 26:365–381 · DOI
- Chavoshi N, Hamooni H, Mueen A (2016) Debot: twitter bot detection via warped correlation. Icdm 18:28–65
- Chen E, Ferrara, E (2023) Tweets in time of conflict: a public dataset tracking the twitter discourse on the war between Ukraine and Russia. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), · DOI
- Claudia O-R, Mark TK (2018) Modeling and predicting news consumption on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp 321–329, 2018 · DOI
- David M Beskow and Kathleen M Carley (2018) Bot-hunter: a tiered approach to detecting & characterizing automated activity on twitter. In: Conference paper. SBP-BRiMS: International conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction and behavior representation in modeling and simulation, vol. 3
- de Keulenaar Emillie, Magalhães João C, Ganesh Bharath (2023) Modulating moderation: a history of objectionability in twitter moderation practices. J Commun 73(3):273–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad015 · DOI
- Graham Jesse, Haidt Sena Koleva, Motyl Matt, Iyer Ravi, Wojcik Sean P, Ditto Peter H (2013) Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 47:55–130 · DOI
- Hatemi Peter K, Crabtree Charles, Smith Kevin B (2019) Ideology justifies morality: political beliefs predict moral foundations. Am J Political Sci 63(4):788–806 · DOI
- Jarred P (2017) Commanding the trend: social media as information warfare. Routledge, London
- Judith B, Yicong H, Sydney G, Suellen H, Chen L, Gloria M (2023) Understanding underlying moral values and language use of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes on Twitter — academic.oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/2/3/pgad013/7070624,
- Kareem D, Peter S, Michaël A, Nakov P (2023) View of unsupervised user stance detection on twitter — ojs.aaai.org. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7286/7140,
- Kumankov Arseniy (2023) View of Nazism, genocide and the threat of the global west Russian moral justification of war in Ukraine. Etikk i praksis-Nordic J Appl Ethics 1:7–27
- Liangjie H, Brian DD (2011) Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics — dl.acm.org. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1964858.1964870, · DOI
- Mohiuddin MAQ, Vijay M (2020) Tweetbert: a pretrained language representation model for twitter text Analysis. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.11091.pdf · arXiv
- National academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine. Chapter 6: integrating social and behavioral sciences (SBS) Research to Enhance Security in Cyberspace, chapter 6. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17226/25335 · DOI
- Ofer F (2019) On the “Gerasimov Doctrine” — jstor.org. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26803233.pdf
- Peixian Z, Ehsan-Ul H, Yiming Z, Pan H, and Gareth T (2023) Echo Chambers within the Russo-Ukrainian War: The Role of Bipartisan Users. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 154-158 · DOI
- Peng T (2023) Differentiation and unity: a cross-platform comparison analysis of online posts’ semantics of the Russian-Ukrainian war based on Weibo and twitter. Commun Public 8(2):105–124 · DOI
- Smith Steven T, Kao Edward K, Mackin Erika D, Shah Danelle C, Simek Olga, Rubin Donald B (2021) Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(4):2011216118 · DOI
- Song H, Tolochko P, Eberl J-M, Eisele O, Greussing E, Heidenreich T, Lind F, Galyga S, Boomgaarden HG (2020) In validations we trust? the impact of imperfect human annotations as a gold standard on the quality of validation of automated content analysis. Polit Commun 37(4):553–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723752 · DOI · Paper page
- Ng LHX, Robertson DC, Carley KM (2022) Stabilizing a supervised bot detection algorithm: How much data is needed for consistent predictions?. Online Social Networks and Media, 28, 100198. · DOI
- Ng LHX, Carley KM (2023a) Botbuster: Multi-platform bot detection using a mixture of experts. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media 17:686–697. · DOI
- Ng LHX, Carley KM (2023b) Deflating the Chinese balloon: types of Twitter bots in US-China balloon incident. EPJ Data Science, 12(1):63. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotionally based strategic communications as a new tool in defensive cognitive warfare
Ćosić, K., Popović, S., & Wiederhold, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1751406 · Cited by 4
Cosic, K., Kuljanac, A., & Palermo, S. (2026) · Frontiers in psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1821242 · Cited by 3
“AI systems could analyze how adversaries’ disinformation spreads across modern media and social networks (Cinelli et al., 2022; Marigliano et al., 2024; Pacheco et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021), allowing our defense and security policymakers to respond faster and more effectively.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Marigliano, R., Ng, L. H. X., & Carley, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marigliano, Rebecca
- Venue
- Social Network Analysis and Mining
- Published
- 2024-08-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1869-5450 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-5469
- OpenAlex
- W4401805905
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Network Analysis and Mining (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Army (W911NF20D0002)
- Office of Naval Research (N000142112229)
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- Russian disinformation campaigns, Russian invasion of Ukraine, counter-narratives, information warfare, Twitter, topic modeling, public opinion manipulation, geopolitical narratives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review