Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 338 of the 338 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere

Open access
Folke, Carl, Polasky, Stephen, Rockström, Johan, Galaz, Victor, Westley, Frances, Lamont, Michèle, Scheffer, Marten, Österblom, Henrik, Carpenter, Stephen R., Chapin, F. Stuart, Seto, Karen C., Weber, Elke U., Crona, Beatrice I., Daily, Gretchen C., Dasgupta, Partha, Gaffney, Owen, Gordon, Line J., Hoff, Holger, Levin, Simon A., Lubchenco, Jane, Steffen, Will, Walker, Brian H.·2021·Ambio

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed an interconnected and tightly coupled globalized world in rapid change. This article sets the scientific stage for understanding and responding to such change for global sustainability and resilient societies. We provide a systemic overview of the current situation where people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere, placing shocks and extreme events as part of this dynamic; humanity has become the major force in shaping the future of the Earth system as a whole; and the scale and pace of the human dimension have caused climate change, rapid loss of biodiversity, growing inequalities, and loss of resilience to deal with uncertainty and surprise. Taken together, human actions are challenging the biosphere foundation for a prosperous development of civilizations. The Anthropocene reality—of rising system-wide turbulence—calls for transformative change towards sustainable futures. Emerging technologies, social innovations, broader shifts in cultural repertoires, as well as a diverse portfolio of active stewardship of human actions in support of a resilient biosphere are highlighted as essential parts of such transformations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8

Cites

338 of 338 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 338 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bain, W. 2019. Continuity and change in international relations 1919–2019. International Relations 33: 132–141. · doi:10.1177/0047117819850238
  2. Chapin, F.S., III. 2020. Grassroots stewardship: Sustainability within our reach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081195.001.0001
  3. Ciais, P., C. Sabine, B. Govindasamy, L. Bopp, V. Brovkin, J. Canadell, A. Chhabra, R. DeFries, et al. 2013. Chapter 6: Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, eds. T. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Platner, et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Folke, C., S. Polasky, J. Rockström, V. Galaz, F. Westley, M. Lamont, M. Scheffer, H. Österblom, et al. 2020. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere: Global sustainability and resilient societies. Paper for the Nobel Prize Summit - Our Planet, Our Future. Beijer Discussion Paper 272. Beijer Institute, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden. · DOI
  5. Fortnam, M., K. Brown, T. Chaigneau, B. Crona, T.M. Daw, D. Goncalves, C. Hicks, M. Revmatas, et al. 2019. The gendered nature of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 159: 312–325. · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.018
  6. Green, J.F., and B. Rudyk. 2020. Closing the high seas to fishing: A club approach. Marine Policy 115: 103855. · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103855
  7. Hassan, N., M. Yousuf, M.A. Mahfuzul Haque, J. Suarez Rivas, and M. Khadimul Islam. 2019. Examining the roles of automation, crowds and professionals towards sustainable fact-checking. Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, 1001–1006.
  8. Heal, G., B.H. Walker, S.A. Levin, K. Arrow, P. Dasgupta, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, K.-G. Maler, et al. 2004. Genetic diversity and interdependent crop choices in agriculture. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 175–184. · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.006
  9. IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
  10. Mandle, L., J. Salzman, and G.C. Daily, eds. 2019. Green Growth that works: Natural capital policy and finance mechanisms from around the world. Washington DC: Island Press.
  11. McAfee, A. 2019. More from less: The surprising story of how we learned to prosper using fewer resources, and what happens next. New York: Scribner.
  12. Moore, M.-L., D. Riddell, and D. Vosicano. 2015. Scaling out, up and deep. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 58: 67–84. · doi:10.9774/gleaf.4700.2015.ju.00009
  13. Österblom, H., C.C.C. Wabnitz, D. Tladi, E.H. Allison, S. Arnaud Haond, et al. 2019. Towards ocean equity. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  14. Pörtner, H.-O., D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, et al. (eds.). 2019. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.
  15. Schmidheiny, S., with the Business Council for Sustainable Development. 1992. Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  16. Sumaila, U.R., M. Walsh, K. Hoareau, A. Cox, et al. 2020. Ocean finance: Financing the transition to a sustainable ocean economy. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. www.oceanpanel.org/bluepapers/ocean-finance-financing-transition-sustainable-ocean-economy.
  17. UN-Habitat. 2016. The widening urban divide. Chapter four in Urbanisation and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report. 2016. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). Kenya: Nairobi.
  18. Walker, B.H. 2019. Finding resilience. Canberra: CSIRO Press. · doi:10.1071/9781486310784
  19. Weber, E.U., and E.J. Johnson. 2016. Can we think of the future? Cognitive barriers to future-oriented thinking. In Global cooperation and the human factor, ed. D. Messner and S. Weinlich, 139–154. New York, NY: Routledge.
  20. WMO. 2020. World meteorological organization state of the global climate 2020, provisional report. Geneva: WMO.
  21. WRI. 2020. 4 Charts explain greenhouse gas emissions by countries and sectors. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Seto, K. C., Weber, E. U., Crona, B. I., Daily, G. C., Dasgupta, P., Gaffney, O., Gordon, L. J., Hoff, H., Levin, S. A., Lubchenco, J., Steffen, W., & Walker, B. H.
Venue
Ambio
Published
2021-03-14
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
834-869
ISSN
  • 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-7209
OpenAlex
W3136594673
Cited by
696
References
338
FWCI
49.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
  • Kjell och Märta Beijers Stiftelse
  • Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse
  • Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation
  • Stockholm University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8
The paper
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Seto, K. C., Weber, E. U., Crona, B. I., Daily, G. C., Dasgupta, P., Gaffney, O., Gordon, L. J., Hoff, H., Levin, S. A., . . . Walker, B. H. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.