Achievement of Glycated Hemoglobin Goals in the US Remains Unchanged Through 2014
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous research has found that the percentage of US adults with diabetes achieving a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target of <7.0% with currently available treatments has been fairly constant from 2003 to 2010, remaining at just over 50% [1]. The objective of this study was to compare the most recent data (2011-2014) with earlier data to track progress on HbA1c target achievement, for both the general target of <7.0% and inferred individualized targets based on age and the presence of complications. METHODS: Data from 2677 adults with self-reported diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2014 were examined to determine the percentage of adults who achieved HbA1c targets of <7% and an individualized target based on age and comorbidities. National estimates are reported by using weights that account for the complex sampling design of the NHANES. RESULTS: The percentage of people with diabetes and HbA1c <7.0% slightly declined from 52.2% (95% CI 48.7-55.7%) to 50.9% (95% CI 47.2-54.7%) between the two most recent waves of data. Achievement of individualized targets declined from 69.8% (95% CI 66.5-73.0%) to 63.8% (95% CI 60.1-67.5%). The percentage with HbA1c >9.0% increased from 12.6% (95% CI 10.5-14.8%) to 15.5% (95% CI 12.9-18.2%). Achievement of individualized targets varied by age group and presence of comorbidities, but exhibited similar trends as general target achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of many new medications to treat diabetes during the past decade, the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control targets has not improved. FUNDING: Intarcia Therapeutics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many people with diabetes do not meet glycemic control targets.
“Despite the huge improvements in diabetes technologies, such as glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps, many people with diabetes do not meet glycemic control targets [23] and would benefit from greater flexibility and more individualized diabetes therapy.”
From Effectiveness of Disease-Specific mHealth Apps in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Carls, G., Huynh, J., Tuttle, E., Yee, J., & Edelman, S. V.
- Affiliations
- Analysis Group (United States) (US)
- Intarcia Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carls, Ginger
- Venue
- Diabetes Therapy
- Published
- 2017-06-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 863-873
- ISSN
- 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6961
- PMC
- PMC5544616
- OpenAlex
- W2653457112
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 20.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Intarcia Therapeutics Inc
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- HbA1c, HbA1c targets, glycemic control, diabetes mellitus, individualized glycemic targets, HbA1c trends, diabetes treatment outcomes, comorbidities, NHANES
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review