Cited by 228Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Achievement of Glycated Hemoglobin Goals in the US Remains Unchanged Through 2014

Open access
Carls, Ginger, Huynh, Johnny, Tuttle, Edward, Yee, John, Edelman, Steven V.·2017·Diabetes Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has found that the percentage of US adults with diabetes achieving a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target of <7.0% with currently available treatments has been fairly constant from 2003 to 2010, remaining at just over 50% [1]. The objective of this study was to compare the most recent data (2011-2014) with earlier data to track progress on HbA1c target achievement, for both the general target of <7.0% and inferred individualized targets based on age and the presence of complications. METHODS: Data from 2677 adults with self-reported diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2014 were examined to determine the percentage of adults who achieved HbA1c targets of <7% and an individualized target based on age and comorbidities. National estimates are reported by using weights that account for the complex sampling design of the NHANES. RESULTS: The percentage of people with diabetes and HbA1c <7.0% slightly declined from 52.2% (95% CI 48.7-55.7%) to 50.9% (95% CI 47.2-54.7%) between the two most recent waves of data. Achievement of individualized targets declined from 69.8% (95% CI 66.5-73.0%) to 63.8% (95% CI 60.1-67.5%). The percentage with HbA1c >9.0% increased from 12.6% (95% CI 10.5-14.8%) to 15.5% (95% CI 12.9-18.2%). Achievement of individualized targets varied by age group and presence of comorbidities, but exhibited similar trends as general target achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of many new medications to treat diabetes during the past decade, the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control targets has not improved. FUNDING: Intarcia Therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13300-017-0280-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 228

Authors
Carls, G., Huynh, J., Tuttle, E., Yee, J., & Edelman, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Analysis Group (United States) (US)
  • Intarcia Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Carls, Ginger
Venue
Diabetes Therapy
Published
2017-06-23
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
863-873
ISSN
  • 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6961
OpenAlex
W2653457112
Cited by
228
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
FWCI
20.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Intarcia Therapeutics Inc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
HbA1c, HbA1c targets, glycemic control, diabetes mellitus, individualized glycemic targets, HbA1c trends, diabetes treatment outcomes, comorbidities, NHANES

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review