Timing of Insulin Injections, Adherence, and Glycemic Control in a Multinational Sample of People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the association of bolus insulin dose timing with demographics, adherence, diabetes education program participation, experience with hypoglycemic events, glycemic control, and patient preference among respondents with type 2 diabetes. Adults with type 2 diabetes from 12 countries were recruited to a Web-based self-reported patient preference survey. Adherence was measured using an adapted Morisky Medication Adherence Scale questionnaire. In total 1483 respondents reported using bolus insulin with 58% ( n = 864) dosing bolus insulin before meals (pre-meal cohort), 354 (24%) during or after meals (post-meal cohort), and 265 (18%) before, during, or after meals (mixed cohort). The mixed cohort was excluded, thus 1218 respondents were included in the analysis. Respondent distribution across HbA 1c category differed significantly depending on insulin dose timing ( p = 0.0006); more respondents in the post-meal cohort (40%) had HbA 1c ≥ 9% (74.9 mmol/mol) than in the pre-meal cohort (29%). The post-meal cohort was significantly more likely to report non-adherence than the pre-meal cohort (OR = 1.50, p = 0.01) and significantly more often reported participating in diabetes education programs ( p < 0.05). Seventy-eight percent of all respondents reported preferring bolus insulin administrable whenever convenient. Approximately 24% of respondents never comply with guidelines for insulin dose timing, with higher risk of non-adherence and increased participation in diabetes care programs. Respondents dosing insulin post-meal are more likely to have poor glycemic control (HbA 1c ≥ 9%, 74.9 mmol/mol). Given that many respondents had high HbA 1c and were non-adherent, a treatment which satisfies patient preference for bolus insulin with flexible dose timing could be considered. Novo Nordisk.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulties with insulin dosing and inaccurate dose timing result in poor glycemic control for people with diabetes.
“Difficulties with insulin dosing and inaccurate dose timing have been shown to result in poor glycemic control for people with diabetes.5,6”
From Increased Time in Range and Fewer Missed Bolus Injections After Introduction of a Smart Connected Insulin Pen (2020) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Schaper, N. C., Nikolajsen, A., Sandberg, A., Buchs, S., & Bøgelund, M.
- Affiliations
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (NL)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Sandberg, Anna
- Venue
- Diabetes Therapy
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1319-1329
- ISSN
- 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6961
- PMC
- PMC5688983
- OpenAlex
- W2766336259
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, bolus insulin, medication adherence, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes education program, hypoglycemia, patient preferences, guideline adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review