Cited by 45Immune responses and vaccinationsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

Demystifying BCG vaccine and COVID-19 relationship

Open access
Kumar, Jogender, Meena, Jitendra·2020·Indian Pediatrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13312-020-1872-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 45

Authors
Kumar, J., & Meena, J.
Affiliations
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Jogender
Venue
Indian Pediatrics
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
588-589
ISSN
  • 0019-6061 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-7559
OpenAlex
W3022267928
Cited by
45
References
7
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
BCG vaccine, COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 incidence, confounding, causal inference, non-specific vaccine effects, COVID-19 prevention, reporting bias
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BCG Vaccine, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Viral Vaccines, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review