Sensory Processing Dysfunction and Mealtime Behavior Problems in Children with Autism
Abstract
Objective To compare sensory processing and mealtime problem behaviors among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing controls, and to examine the relationship between atypical sensory processing and eating problems in children with ASD.Methods 50 children (4-10 years) with a diagnosis of ASD as per DSM-5 were recruited from the pediatric psychology clinic of a tertiary care center in India. The Brief Assessment of Mealtime Behavior in Children (BAMBIC) and the Short Sensory Profile (SSP) were administered to measure feeding and sensory processing problems, respectively. Parents were interviewed about their child's dietary intake using a 3-day dietary recall.Results The ASD group showed greater mealtime behavior problems than the control group and had significantly higher total scores on the BAMBIC (P<0.001), and on two of the three subscales including food refusal (P<0.001) and disruptive behavior (P<0.001). The ASD group, relative to the neurotypical children, showed atypical response on majority of the subscales of the short sensory profile including tactile sensitivity (P<0.001), taste sensitivity (P<0.001), movement sensitivity (P<0.001), under responsiveness (P<0.001), auditory filtering (P<0.001), low weak/energy (P=0.02), and visual/auditory sensitivity (P<0.001).Conclusions The study underscores the need for detailed evaluation of sensory processing and feeding problems of children with ASD so that the interventions can be tailored to address their unique sensory characteristics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The process of eating is complex and includes integration of various sensory aspects that influence individual acceptance and preference for food or its groups.
“The process of eating is quite complex, and includes the integration of various sensory aspects that influence individual acceptance and preference for food or its groups [41,42].”
From Food Selectivity and Its Implications Associated with Gastrointestinal Disorders in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Malhi, P., Saini, S., Bharti, B., Attri, S., & Sankhyan, N.
- Affiliations
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Malhi, Prahbhjot
- Venue
- Indian Pediatrics
- Published
- 2021-05-20
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 842-845
- ISSN
- 0019-6061 (ISSN-L)
- 0974-7559
- OpenAlex
- W3160903746
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Indian Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, sensory processing disorders, feeding difficulties, food refusal, sensory sensitivity, children, dietary intake, Short Sensory Profile
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Perception, Meals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review