Cited by 10Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Investigation of intrathecal transport of NPT002, a prospective therapeutic based on phage M13, in nonhuman primates

Papisov, Mikhail I., Belov, V., Belova, E., Fischman, A. J., Fisher, R., Wright, J. L., Gannon, K. S., Titus, J. +2 more·2012·Drug Delivery and Translational Research

Abstract

Presently, there are no effective treatments for conditions characterized by protein misfolding, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other diseases involving CNS. Since misfolding occurs at the earliest stage of the disease, it is likely to be involved in subsequent pathological developments. It has been found that NPT002 (bacteriophage M13) directly dissociates aggregates of misfolded proteins that form amyloid, including amyloid-β, tau and α-synuclein. For CNS applications, NPT002 requires delivery to the brain parenchyma, the target tissue. NPT002 is an elongated ~950 nm particle that cannot penetrate into the brain from the blood. Furthermore, phage particles, due to their size, cannot be effectively transported in vivo by diffusion. Considering the physiology of the leptomeningeal space, intrathecal administration appears to be a promising convection-driven avenue for NPT002 delivery. In this paper, we use positron emission tomography to investigate the transport of NPT002 in Macaca fascicularis. The data suggest that approximately 50 % of the administered dose can reach the cerebral leptomeningeal space after a single lumbar intrathecal injection. A biologically significant fraction of the phage then enters the brain, resulting in potentially therapeutic cortical and subcortical exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13346-012-0074-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Widespread penetration of substances from CSF into brain parenchyma along perivascular spaces of arteries is well supported by animal studies with a similar experimental setup.

    “Widespread penetration of substances from CSF into brain parenchyma along perivascular spaces of arteries is, however, well supported by animal studies with a similar experimental setup to ours (1, 47-49).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 10

Authors
Papisov, M. I., Belov, V., Belova, E., Fischman, A. J., Fisher, R., Wright, J. L., Gannon, K. S., Titus, J., Gagne, M., & Gillooly, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Papisov, Mikhail I.
Venue
Drug Delivery and Translational Research
Published
2012-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
210-221
ISSN
  • 2190-393X (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-3948
OpenAlex
W2125488076
Cited by
10
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Delivery and Translational Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Siemens Medical Solutions USA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
M13 bacteriophage, intrathecal drug delivery, phage therapy, protein misfolding, amyloid fibril formation, amyloid-beta, tau protein, alpha-synuclein, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, non-human primates, Macaca fascicularis, positron emission tomography, brain penetration, lumbar injection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review