Investigation of intrathecal transport of NPT002, a prospective therapeutic based on phage M13, in nonhuman primates
Abstract
Presently, there are no effective treatments for conditions characterized by protein misfolding, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other diseases involving CNS. Since misfolding occurs at the earliest stage of the disease, it is likely to be involved in subsequent pathological developments. It has been found that NPT002 (bacteriophage M13) directly dissociates aggregates of misfolded proteins that form amyloid, including amyloid-β, tau and α-synuclein. For CNS applications, NPT002 requires delivery to the brain parenchyma, the target tissue. NPT002 is an elongated ~950 nm particle that cannot penetrate into the brain from the blood. Furthermore, phage particles, due to their size, cannot be effectively transported in vivo by diffusion. Considering the physiology of the leptomeningeal space, intrathecal administration appears to be a promising convection-driven avenue for NPT002 delivery. In this paper, we use positron emission tomography to investigate the transport of NPT002 in Macaca fascicularis. The data suggest that approximately 50 % of the administered dose can reach the cerebral leptomeningeal space after a single lumbar intrathecal injection. A biologically significant fraction of the phage then enters the brain, resulting in potentially therapeutic cortical and subcortical exposure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Widespread penetration of substances from CSF into brain parenchyma along perivascular spaces of arteries is well supported by animal studies with a similar experimental setup.
“Widespread penetration of substances from CSF into brain parenchyma along perivascular spaces of arteries is, however, well supported by animal studies with a similar experimental setup to ours (1, 47-49).”
From Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI. (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Papisov, M. I., Belov, V., Belova, E., Fischman, A. J., Fisher, R., Wright, J. L., Gannon, K. S., Titus, J., Gagne, M., & Gillooly, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Papisov, Mikhail I.
- Venue
- Drug Delivery and Translational Research
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-221
- ISSN
- 2190-393X (ISSN-L)
- 2190-3948
- OpenAlex
- W2125488076
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Drug Delivery and Translational Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- M13 bacteriophage, intrathecal drug delivery, phage therapy, protein misfolding, amyloid fibril formation, amyloid-beta, tau protein, alpha-synuclein, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, non-human primates, Macaca fascicularis, positron emission tomography, brain penetration, lumbar injection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review