Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). The Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Authors
- Floridi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- ORCID
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2018-02-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W3125550155
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1, EP/N023013/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- digital governance, infosphere, information society, technological disruption, onlife, Internet of Things, smart cities, machine-readable data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
