Quantification of lysine acetylation and succinylation stoichiometry in proteins using mass spectrometric data-independent acquisitions (SWATH)
Open accessAbstract
-acylation is an important regulator of protein function. Many large-scale protein acylation studies have assessed relative changes of lysine acylation sites after antibody enrichment using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Although relative acylation fold-changes are important, this does not reveal site occupancy, or stoichiometry, of individual modification sites, which is critical to understand functional consequences. Recently, methods for determining lysine acetylation stoichiometry have been proposed based on ratiometric analysis of endogenous levels to those introduced after quantitative per-acetylation of proteins using stable isotope-labeled acetic anhydride. However, in our hands, we find that these methods can overestimate acetylation stoichiometries because of signal interferences when endogenous levels of acylation are very low, which is especially problematic when using MS1 scans for quantification. In this study, we sought to improve the accuracy of determining acylation stoichiometry using data-independent acquisition (DIA). Specifically, we use SWATH acquisition to comprehensively collect both precursor and fragment ion intensity data. The use of fragment ions for stoichiometry quantification not only reduces interferences but also allows for determination of site-level stoichiometry from peptides with multiple lysine residues. We also demonstrate the novel extension of this method to measurements of succinylation stoichiometry using deuterium-labeled succinic anhydride. Proof of principle SWATH acquisition studies were first performed using bovine serum albumin for both acetylation and succinylation occupancy measurements, followed by the analysis of more complex samples of E. coli cell lysates. Although overall site occupancy was low (<1%), some proteins contained lysines with relatively high acetylation occupancy. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chemical labeling approaches, apart from the SILAC-based indirect method that overestimates due to cross-talk with other lysine modifications, indicate that average occupancy of most mitochondrial acetylation sites is below 1%.
“With the exception of the SILAC-based indirect stoichiometry method (which overestimates stoichiometry via crosstalk with other lysine modifications), all the chemical labeling methods have concluded that most of the mitochondrial protein acetylation sites are occupied at less than 1% on average.”
From The Mitochondrial Acylome Emerges: Proteomics, Regulation by Sirtuins, and Metabolic and Disease Implications (2018) · cites this paper as Meyer et al. 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Meyer, J. G., D’Souza, A. K., Sorensen, D. J., Rardin, M. J., Wolfe, A. J., Gibson, B. W., & Schilling, B.
- Affiliations
- Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gibson, Bradford W.
- Schilling, Birgit
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-09-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1758-1771
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5059418
- OpenAlex
- W2515436982
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Science (DE-SC0012443)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R24DK085610)
- National Institutes of Health (T32G000266)
- National Center for Research Resources (1S10 OD016281)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- lysine acetylation, lysine succinylation, site occupancy, bovine serum albumin, Escherichia coli cell lysate, post-translational modification
- MeSH terms
- Acetylation, Escherichia coli, Lysine, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review