The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medicaid Expansions and Fertility in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Beginning in the mid-1980s and extending through the early to mid-1990s, a substantial number of women and children in the United States gained eligibility for Medicaid through a series of income-based expansions. Using natality data from the National Center for Health Statistics, we estimate fertility responses to these eligibility expansions. We follow Currie and Gruber (2001) and measure changes in state Medicaid-eligibility policy by simulating the fraction of a standard population that would qualify for benefits in different states and different time periods. From 1985 to 1996, the fraction of women aged 15–44 who were eligible for Medicaid coverage for a pregnancy increased more than 20 percentage points. When we use a state and year fixed-effects model with a limited set of covariates, our estimates indicate that fertility increases in response to Medicaid expansions. However, after we include fixed effects for demographic characteristics, the estimated relationship diminishes substantially in size and is no longer statistically significant. We conclude that there is no robust relationship between Medicaid expansions and fertility.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“more detailed controls suggest a 0.2 percent reduction in fertility (p < 0.1)”
From Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature (2021) · cites this paper as Deleire et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
The effect of Medicaid eligibility expansions on fertility
Zavodny, M., & Bitler, M. P. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.046 · Cited by 57
The Response of Births to Changes in Health Care Costs
Leibowitz, A. (1990) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145672 · Cited by 30
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- An, 1993, Teen out-of-wedlock births and welfare receipt: The role of childhood events and economic circumstances, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 195, 10.2307/2109424 · DOI
- Becker, 1991, A treatise on the family (enlarged ed.), 10.4159/9780674020665 · DOI · Paper page
- Becker, 1973, On the interaction between quality and quantity, Journal of Political Economy, 81, S279, 10.1086/260166 · DOI
- Bitler, 2006, Effects of increased access to infertility treatment on infant and child health: Evidence from health insurance mandates (Working Paper WR-330)
- Bitler, 2006, Health disparities and infertility: Impacts of state-level insurance mandates, Fertility and Sterility, 85, 858, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038 · DOI
- Blank, 1996, State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment, Journal of Health Economics, 15, 513, 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00494-8 · DOI
- Bundorf, 2007, Mandated health insurance benefits and the utilization and outcomes of infertility treatments (NBER Working Paper No. 12820), 10.3386/w12820 · DOI
- Card, 2004, Using discontinuous eligibility rules to identify the effects of the federal Medicaid expansions on low-income children, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 752, 10.1162/0034653041811798 · DOI
- Currie, 1996, Saving babies: The efficacy and cost of recent changes in the Medicaid eligibility of pregnant women, Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1263, 10.1086/262059 · DOI
- Currie, 2001, Public health insurance and medical treatment: The equalizing impact of the Medicaid expansions, Journal of Public Economics, 82, 63, 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00140-7 · DOI
- Cutler, 1996, Does public insurance crowd out private insurance?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 391, 10.2307/2946683 · DOI
- Dickert-Conlin, 1999, Taxes and the timing of births, Journal of Political Economy, 107, 161, 10.1086/250054 · DOI
- Dubay, 1997, Did Medicaid expansions for pregnant women crowd-out private insurance?, Health Affairs, 16, 185, 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.185 · DOI
- Duncan, 1990, Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among black teenage girls, Demography, 27, 519, 10.2307/2061568 · DOI
- Espenshade, 1977, The value and cost of children, Population Bulletin, 32, 1
- Foster, 2002, How economists think about family resources and child development, Child Development, 73, 1904, 10.1111/1467-8624.00513 · DOI
- Gruber, 2003, Medicaid, 15, 10.7208/chicago/9780226533575.003.0002 · DOI
- Gruber, 2008, Crowd-out ten years later: Have recent public insurance expansions crowded out private health insurance?, Journal of Health Economics, 27, 201, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.004 · DOI
- Hamilton, 2005, Infertility treatment markets: The effects of competition and policy (Working paper)
- Hao, 2004, Welfare reform and teenage pregnancy, childbirth, and school dropout, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 179, 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00012.x-i1 · DOI
- Hoffman, 2000, AFDC benefits and nonmarital births to young women, The Journal of Human Resources, 35, 376, 10.2307/146330 · DOI
- Horvath-Rose, 2001, Welfare waivers and non-marital childbearing, 222
- Hoynes, 1997, Does Welfare play any role in female headship decisions?, Journal of Public Economics, 65, 89, 10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00022-4 · DOI
- Joyce, 1998, Is Medicaid pronatalist? The effect of eligibility expansions on abortions and births, Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 108, 10.2307/2991623 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaestner, 2003, Has welfare reform changed teenage behavior?, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 225, 10.1002/pam.10115 · DOI
- Kane, 1996, Teen motherhood and abortion access, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 467, 10.2307/2946685 · DOI
- Kearney, 2004, Is there an effect of incremental welfare benefits on fertility behavior? A look at the family cap, The Journal of Human Resources, 39, 295, 10.2307/3559016 · DOI
- Kearney, 2009, Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 137, 10.1162/rest.91.1.137 · DOI
- Levine, 2004, Sex and consequences: Abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility, 10.1515/9780691221649 · DOI
- Levine, 1996, The effect of Medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies, and births, Journal of Health Economics, 15, 555, 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00495-X · DOI
- Lewit, 1992, Expenditures on health care for children and pregnant women, The Future of Children, 2, 95, 10.2307/1602564 · DOI
- Lindrooth, 2007, The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births, Women’s Health, Issues, 17, 66, 10.1016/j.whi.2007.02.012 · DOI
- Lo Sasso, 2004, The effect of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on health insurance coverage, Journal of Health Economics, 23, 1059, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.006 · DOI
- Lopoo, 2006, Did welfare reform influence the fertility of young teens?, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 275, 10.1002/pam.20173 · DOI
- Lundberg, 1995, Adolescent premarital childbearing: Do economic incentives matter?, Journal of Labor Economics, 13, 177, 10.1086/298372 · DOI
- Mayer, 1997, What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances
- Mellor, 1998, The effect of family planning programs on the fertility of welfare recipients: Evidence from Medicaid claims, The Journal of Human Resources, 33, 866, 10.2307/146401 · DOI
- Moffitt, 2003, The temporary assistance for needy families program, 291, 10.7208/chicago/9780226533575.003.0006 · DOI
- Schmidt, 2007, Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility, Journal of Health Economics, 26, 431, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.012 · DOI
- Tritz, 2006, Side-by-side comparison of Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP provisions in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL33251)
- Whittington, 1990, Fertility and the personal exemption: Implicit pronatalist policy in the United States, The American Economic Review, 80, 545
- Yazici, 2000, Medicaid expansions and the crowding out of private health insurance among children, Inquiry, 37, 23
- Yelowitz, 1998, Will extending Medicaid to two-parent families encourage marriage?, The Journal of Human Resources, 33, 833, 10.2307/146400 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature
Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12431 · Cited by 259
The effect of Medicaid eligibility expansions on fertility
Zavodny, M., & Bitler, M. P. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.046 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLeire, T., Lopoo, L. M., & Simon, K. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Syracuse University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lopoo, Leonard M.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2011-04-16
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 725-747
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W3097826426
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Demography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- Medicaid expansion, fertility, Medicaid eligibility, pregnancy, maternal health insurance, state health policy, natality data, fixed effects model
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Birth Rate, Eligibility Determination, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Medicaid, Population Dynamics, Poverty, Pregnancy, United States, Insurance Coverage, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review