Cited by 540Family Dynamics and RelationshipsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Investing in Children: Changes in Parental Spending on Children, 1972–2007

Open access
Kornrich, Sabino, Furstenberg, Frank·2013·Demography

Abstract

Parental spending on children is often presumed to be one of the main ways that parents invest in children and a main reason why children from wealthier households are advantaged. Yet, although research has tracked changes in the other main form of parental investment—namely, time—there is little research on spending. We use data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey to examine how spending changed from the early 1970s to the late 2000s, focusing particularly on inequality in parental investment in children. Parental spending increased, as did inequality of investment. We also investigate shifts in the composition of spending and linkages to children’s characteristics. Investment in male and female children changed substantially: households with only female children spent significantly less than parents in households with only male children in the early 1970s; but by the 1990s, spending had equalized; and by the late 2000s, girls appeared to enjoy an advantage. Finally, the shape of parental investment over the course of children’s lives changed. Prior to the 1990s, parents spent most on children in their teen years. After the 1990s, however, spending was greatest when children were under the age of 6 and in their mid-20s.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-012-0146-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kornrich, S., & Furstenberg, F.
Affiliations
  • Fundación Juan March (ES)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Demography
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2053646573
Cited by
540
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
45.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
parental investment, intergenerational inequality, child characteristics, household wealth, Consumer Expenditure Survey
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Demography, Family, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review