The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A pilot study to determine if the use of a virtual reality education module reduces anxiety and increases comprehension in patients receiving radiation therapy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For EBRT, several nonpharmacological approaches have been investigated, including music therapy, relaxation therapy, and VR-augmented patient education.
“For external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), several nonpharmacological approaches have been investigated, including music therapy,8 relaxation therapy,9 or even VR-augmented patient education.10”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Marquess, M., Johnston, S. P., Williams, N. L., Giordano, C., Leiby, B. E., Hurwitz, M. D., Dicker, A. P., & Den, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Noelle L.
- Venue
- Journal of Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2017-03-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-322
- ISSN
- 1948-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-7908
- OpenAlex
- W2600137585
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Radiation Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- virtual reality, patient education, radiotherapy, prostate cancer, patient anxiety, virtual simulation, patient satisfaction, radiotherapy quality assurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
