CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 940Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review

Open access
Nkoa, Roger·2014·Agronomy for Sustainable Development
DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 210 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Al Seadi T, Moller HB (2003) Separation of slurry—a potential option for the animal production sector. In: Proceedings of the European biogas workshop “The future of biogas in Europe II”. Esbjerg, 2–4 October
  2. Asman WAH, Van Jaarsveld HA (1990) Regional and Europe-wide emission and transport of NHx compounds. In: Hartung J et al (eds) Ammoniak in der Unwelt, vol 2. Landwirtschaftswerlad, Munster, pp 1–35
  3. Canali S, Bartolomeo ED, Tittarelli F, Montemurro F, Verrastro V, Ferri D (2011) Comparison of different laboratory incubation procedures to evaluate nitrogen mineralization in soil amended with aerobic and anaerobic stabilized organic materials. J Food Agric Environ 9:540–546
  4. Civil Engineering Research Institute of Hokkaido (2003) Research report of environment, resources, and recycling in Hokkaido, Sapporo. Civil Engineering Institute of Hokkaido, Sapporo (in Japanese)
  5. Colleran E (2000) Hygienic and sanitation requirements in biogas plants treating animal manures or mixtures of manures and other organic wastes. In: Orthenblad H (ed) Anaerobic digestion: making energy and solving modern waste problems. Herning Municipal Authorities, Denmark, pp 77–86
  6. DeVleeschauwer D, Verdonck O, Van Assche P (1981) Phytotoxicity of refuse compost. BioCycle 22:44–46
  7. Gericke D (2009) Measuring and modeling of ammonia emissions after field application of biogas slurries. Doctoral thesis, Kiel University, Germany
  8. Hatfield JL, Stewart BA (2002) Animal wastes utilization: effective use of manure as a soil resource. CRC, Boca Raton
  9. IEA (2010) Utilisation of digestate from biogas plants as biofertiliser. International Energy Agency, IEA Bioenergy Task 37, Paris
  10. Loria ER, Sawyer JE (2005) Extractable soil phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen following application of raw and anaerobically digested swine manure. Agron J 97:879–885. doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0249 · DOI
  11. Martin JH (2004) A Comparison of Dairy Cattle Manure Management with and without Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Utilization. Report for the AgSTAR Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, pp. 58. Available at: http://www.ncgreenpower.org/documents/nydairy2003.pdf . Accessed 18 Jan 2013
  12. McConnell DD, Shiralipour A, Smith WH (1993) Compost application improves soil physical properties. Biocycles 34:61–63
  13. Mulla DJ, Birr AS, Randall G, Moncerief J, Schmitt M, Sekely A, Kerre E (2001) Impacts of animal agriculture on water quality: technical work paper. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, Minnesota Planning (Agency), St. Paul
  14. Newton GL, Hubbard RK, Johnson JC,. Davis JG, Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Johnson AW, Williams RG, Dove CR (1994) Utilization and environmental consequences of land application of liquid manure in the southeastern United States coastal plain. In: Proc. Great Plains Anim. Waste Conf. Confined Anim. Prod. Water Quality. Balancing Anim. Prod. and the Environ. Great Plains Agric. Council publ. no. 151, pp 66–73
  15. Odgers E (1991) Regulations bolster voluntary programs for cleanup of agricultural nonpoint “bad actors” in Wisconsin. In: National livestock, poultry and aquaculture waste management: Proc. Natl. Workshop. ASAE Publ. 03-92. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 273–277
  16. Schievano A, Adani F, Tambone F, D’Imporzano G, Scaglia B, Genevini PL (2009) What is digestate? In: Adani F, Schievano A, Boccasile G (eds) Anaerobic digestion: opportunities for agriculture and environment. Lombardia, Milan, pp 7–18
  17. Siebert S (2008) Quality requirements and quality assurance of digestion residuals in Germany. In: ECN/ORBIT workshop The Future of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste in Europe. Nuremberg, Germany
  18. Siebert S, Thelen-Jüngling M, Kehres B (2008) Development of quality assurance and quality characteristics of composts and digestates in Germany. In: Rodic-Wiersma L, Barth J, Bidlingmaier W, de Bertoldi M, Diaz LF (eds) 6th International conference ORBIT 2008—Moving Organic Waste Recycling Towards Resource Management and Biobased Economy. Wageningen, the Netherlands, October 13–15, 2008, pp 1–12
  19. Tipping PJ (1996) Centralised anaerobic digestion: review of environmental effects. MAFF contract CSA 2730. MAFF, London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 940

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nkoa, R.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Nkoa, Roger
Venue
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-12-13
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
473-492
ISSN
  • 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1774-0746
DOI
10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z
OpenAlex
W2105824871
Cited by
940
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4
FWCI
27.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
digestate, biogas digestate, organic fertilizer, organic amendments, soil fertilization, environmental risk, human health risk, ammonia emissions, heavy metal contamination, copper, zinc, manganese toxicity, co-digestion, nitrate contamination, soil carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review