Cited by 355Insect Utilization and EffectsComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

High waste-to-biomass conversion and efficient Salmonella spp. reduction using black soldier fly for waste recycling

Open access
Lalander, Cecilia H., Fidjeland, Jørgen, Diener, Stefan, Eriksson, Sara, Vinnerås, Björn·2015·Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Abstract

The recycling of organic waste worldwide is not effective, which leads to water pollution and loss of potential crop fertilizers. Available resources have to be used more efficiently as the world population increases. An innovative solution is to use insects for the management of organic waste. Here, we used black soldier fly to convert organic waste into animal feed protein, as fly larvae, and plant fertilizer, as compost residue. A continuous fly reactor was monitored for 9 weeks. We analyzed physicochemical and microbial parameters, and we evaluated the sanitary risk. Results show 55.1 % of material degradation and 11.8 % of biomass conversion based upon total solids. We observed higher levels of N and P in the treatment residue than in the inflow material. Results also show a lower concentration of Salmonella spp. and viruses. Compost treatment with black soldier fly is therefore an efficient system for nutrient recycling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13593-014-0235-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lalander, C. H., Fidjeland, J., Diener, S., Eriksson, S., & Vinnerås, B.
Affiliations
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Lalander, Cecilia H.
Venue
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
261-271
ISSN
  • 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1774-0746
OpenAlex
W1990613273
Cited by
355
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Bundesamt für Umwelt
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, organic waste recycling, Salmonella reduction, fly larvae, compost, nutrient cycling, sanitary risk, virus removal, insect protein feed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review