The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review
Open accessAbstract
Intensive agriculture has led to several drawbacks such as biodiversity loss, climate change, erosion, and pollution of air and water. A potential solution is to implement management practices that increase the level of provision of ecosystem services such as soil fertility and biological regulation. There is a lot of literature on the principles of agroecology. However, there is a gap of knowledge between agroecological principles and practical applications. Therefore, we review here agroecological and management sciences to identify two facts that explain the lack of practical applications: (1) the occurrence of high uncertainties about relations between agricultural practices, ecological processes, and ecosystem services, and (2) the site-specific character of agroecological practices required to deliver expected ecosystem services. We also show that an adaptive-management approach, focusing on planning and monitoring, can serve as a framework for developing and implementing learning tools tailored for biodiversity-based agriculture. Among the current learning tools developed by researchers, we identify two main types of emergent support tools likely to help design diversified farming systems and landscapes: (1) knowledge bases containing scientific supports and experiential knowledge and (2) model-based games. These tools have to be coupled with well-tailored field or management indicators that allow monitoring effects of practices on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Finally, we propose a research agenda that requires bringing together contributions from agricultural, ecological, management, and knowledge management sciences, and asserts that researchers have to take the position of “integration and implementation sciences.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While transitioning towards these innovative practices, the challenge for farmers lies in the numerous uncertainties related to the complex nature of agroecosystems, in which ecological processes and ES form an intricate network that is often unpredictable, not fully understood [16], and specific to each production site [17,18].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, many authors argue that the production and diffusion of general scientific knowledge is essential but by itself not enough to support agroecological transitions (Duru et al., 2015).”
From Performance of innovative cropping systems diversified with oilseeds and protein crops: identification and resolution of methodological issues, using the Syppre experimental network as a case study (2024) · cites this paper as Duru et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“Consequently, we do not deal with necessary changes in farmers’ representations, beliefs, and values that involve the so-called second and third learning loops and the associated methods for their development (see Argyris and Schön 1992; Pahl-Wostl et al. 2010).”
MethodAgricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 1×
“…functional biodiversity for sets of organisms (Brussaard et al. 2010; Moonen and Ba 2008), and (ii) how to model interactions among environmental perturbations (including farmers’ management practices), functional biodiversity, and ecosystem services (Cardinale et al. 2012; Gaba et al. 2014).”
Background(2016) · Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) · doi:10.1111/j.1365 · Cited by 5,304
Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x · Cited by 4,455
Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D., & Swackhamer, D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057544 · Cited by 3,992
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2009) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,706
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Garnett T, Godfray C (2012) Sustainable intensification in agriculture. Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. Food climate research network and the oxford martin programme on the future of food. University of Oxford, UK
- Kremen C, Iles A, Bacon C (2012) Diversified farmings: an agroecological, systems-based. Ecol Soc 17(4):44
- Pisante M, Stagnari F, Acutis M, Bindi M, Brilli L, di Stefano V, Carrozi R (2015) Conserv Agric Clim Chang 805:579–620
- Shepherd TG, Stagnari F, Pisante M, Benites J (2008) Visual soil assessment-field guide for annual crops. FAO, Roma, Italy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review
Deguine, J., Aubertot, J., Flor, R. J., Lescourret, F., Wyckhuys, K. A. G., & Ratnadass, A. (2021) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w · Cited by 853
Self-citationDesigning agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542
Self-citationPesticide-free agriculture as a new paradigm for research
Jacquet, F., Jeuffroy, M., Jouan, J., Cadre, E. L., Litrico, I., Malausa, T., Reboud, X., & Huyghe, C. (2022) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00742-8 · Cited by 373
Li, J., Wen, Y., Li, X., Li, Y., Yang, X., Lin, Z., Song, Z., Cooper, J. M., & Zhao, B. (2017) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.08.008 · Cited by 364
A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review
Thérond, O., Duru, M., Roger‐Estrade, J., & Richard, G. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.-A., Justes, E., Journet, E.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.-E., & Sarthou, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (FR)
- AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Duru, Michel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2015-06-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1259-1281
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W601488478
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 186
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 117.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-STRA-0008, ANR-09-STRA-06, ANR-09-STRA-0006, ANR-13-AGRO-0006, ANR-13-AGRO)
- FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology (289328)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- ecosystem services, agroecology, agroecological principles, adaptive management, site-specific management, knowledge base, management indicators, biodiversity monitoring, diversified farming systems, implementation science, knowledge management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
