Patch testing and immunosuppression: a comprehensive review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is ongoing debate among contact dermatitis experts regarding the diagnostic accuracy of patch testing for those on immunomodulators or immunosuppressants, as these medications can dampen positive results and increase the risk for false-negative readings.
“There is ongoing debate among contact dermatitis experts regarding the diagnostic accuracy of patch testing for those on immunomodulators or immunosuppressants, as these medications can dampen positive results and increase the risk for false-negative readings.23”
From Dupilumab for Allergic Contact Dermatitis: An Overview of Its Use and Impact on Patch Testing. (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dupilumab for Allergic Contact Dermatitis: An Overview of Its Use and Impact on Patch Testing.
Johnson, H. (2022) · Current Psychiatry · doi:10.12788/cutis.0519 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levian, B., Chan, J., DeLeo, V. A., & Adler, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adler, Brandon L.
- Venue
- Current Dermatology Reports
- Published
- 2021-10-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 128-139
- ISSN
- 2162-4933 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3210730143
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Dermatology Reports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- patch testing, immunosuppression, allergic contact dermatitis, prednisone, topical corticosteroids, systemic immunosuppressants, dupilumab, UV exposure, HIV, sarcoidosis, leprosy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
