Cited by 73Philosophy and History of ScienceEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEvolution and Science Education

Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About Evolutionary Causes

Lloyd, Elisabeth A.·2015·Biological Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13752-015-0214-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Byproduct explanations require detailed reconstruction and interpretation of causally complex developmental mechanisms linking the byproduct to the adaptive trait, and are arguably more demanding than adaptive explanations.

    “As Lloyd [37] argues, far from being ‘null’ hypotheses of no effect, byproduct explanations require detailed reconstruction and interpretation of causally complex developmental mechanisms that link the byproduct to the adaptive trait. And insofar as they require both an adaptive explanation and a related developmental one, they are arguably more demanding than adaptative explanations [38].”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 105 · Cited by 73

Authors
Lloyd, E. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Lloyd, Elisabeth A.
Venue
Biological Theory
Published
2015-07-09
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
343-362
ISSN
  • 1555-5542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-5550
OpenAlex
W770313112
Cited by
73
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
38.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Theory (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arnold and Maxine Tanis
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, null hypothesis, scientific reasoning, human behavioral ecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review