Optimization of Indole Acetic Acid Production by Pseudomonas putida UB1 and its Effect as Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Mustard (Brassica nigra)
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For bacteria, high IAA production was also obtained in the presence of NH4NO3, opposite to yeast.
“High IAA production was also obtained in the presence of NH4NO3, opposite to yeast.”
From Phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid production by rhizosphere yeast Torulaspora globosa: improvement of culture conditions for better performance in vitro (2022) · cites this paper as Bharucha et al. (2013)
The “Effect of Nitrogen Source on IAA Production” section reports testing NH4NO3 with Pseudomonas putida UB1, but identifies (NH4)2SO4—not NH4NO3—as the best nitrogen source. The paper does not establish that production with NH4NO3 was high or compare the result with yeast. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFor bacteria, in conditions without a nitrogen source, IAA production is impaired, presenting the lowest yields.
“For the bacteria, in conditions that do not have a nitrogen source, the production of IAA is impaired, presenting the lowest yields.”
From Phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid production by rhizosphere yeast Torulaspora globosa: improvement of culture conditions for better performance in vitro (2022) · cites this paper as Bharucha et al. (2013)
The ‘Effect of Nitrogen Source on IAA Production’ section (page unavailable) says nitrogen source affects IAA production in Pseudomonas putida UB1 and identifies ammonium sulfate as the best of the sources tested. It does not state that a nitrogen-free condition produced the lowest yield, and the result for this strain does not establish that outcome for bacteria generally. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBharucha et al. (2013) observed that (NH4)2SO4 was the nitrogen source that presented maximum IAA production by Pseudomonas putida.
“Bharucha et al. (2013), evaluating and optimizing IAA production by the rhizobacteria Pseudomonas putida, observed that (NH4)2SO4 was the nitrogen source that presented the maximum production.”
From Phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid production by rhizosphere yeast Torulaspora globosa: improvement of culture conditions for better performance in vitro (2022) · cites this paper as Bharucha et al. (2013)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bhattacharya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth promoting rhi- zobacteria(PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(1327):1350
- Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Bio- chemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth- promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London
- Leelahawonge C, Pongsilp N (2009) Factors influencing indole- 3-acetic acid biosynthesis of root nodule bacteria isolated from various leguminous plants. Thamasat Int J Sci Tech 14(2):1-12
- Sridevi M, Yadav NCS, Mallaiah KV (2008) Production of indole acetic acid by Rhizobium isolates from Crolataria species. Res J Microbiol 3(4):276-281
- Yadav K, Aggarwal A (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induced acclimatization and growth enhancement of Glycyrrhiza glabra L: a potential medicinal plant. Agric Res 2(1):43-47
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albertini, J., Rocha, R. K., Bastos, R. G., Ceccato-Antonini, S. R., & Rosa-Magri, M. M. (2022) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-022-03322-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bharucha, U., Patel, K., & Trivedi, U. B.
- Affiliations
- Sardar Patel University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Trivedi, Ujjval B.
- Venue
- Agricultural Research
- Published
- 2013-06-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-221
- ISSN
- 2249-720X (ISSN-L)
- 2249-7218
- OpenAlex
- W2050941245
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Agricultural Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University Grants Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Keywords
- indole-3-acetic acid production, Pseudomonas putida, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Brassica nigra, mustard, tryptophan, rhizosphere bacteria, plant growth promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
