SCADA security: a review and enhancement for DNP3 based systems
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coded backdoor passwords which can be used to exploit a system remotely are not uncommon.
“Such coded backdoor passwords which can be used to exploit a system remotely, are not uncommon [19], [44].”
From Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Jain, P., & Tripathi, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Jain, Peeyush
- ORCID
- Jain, Peeyush
- Venue
- CSI Transactions on ICT
- Published
- 2013-10-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301-308
- ISSN
- 2277-9078 (ISSN-L)
- 2277-9086
- OpenAlex
- W1970252573
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- CSI Transactions on ICT (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- SCADA security, DNP3, industrial control systems, critical infrastructure protection, security threats, security analysis, Modbus, industrial communication protocols, power plants, water treatment plant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
