Fostering medical students’ lifelong learning skills with a dashboard, coaching and learning planning
Open accessAbstract
Introduction To develop lifelong learning skills, students need feedback, access to performance data, and coaching. A new medical curriculum incorporated infrastructural supports based on self-regulated learning theory and the Master Adaptive Learner framework to engage students in reflection and learning planning. This study examines students’ experience with a performance dashboard, longitudinal coaching, and structured time for goal-setting. Methods Focus groups with first-year medical students explored performance dashboard usage, coaching and learning planning. We analyzed findings using thematic analysis. Results informed development of a 29-item survey rated strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) to investigate experience with the dashboard, coaching and learning goals program. The survey was distributed to one first-year medical student class. We performed descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Results In three focus groups with 21 participants, students endorsed using the dashboard to access performance information but had trouble interpreting and integrating information. They valued coaches as sources of advice but varied in their perceptions of the value of discussing learning planning. Of 152 students, 114 (75%) completed the survey. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 5 factors explaining 57% of the variance: learning goals development (α = 0.88; mean 3.25 (standard deviation 0.91)), dashboard usage (α = 0.82; 3.36 (0.64)), coaching (α = 0.71; 3.72 (0.64)), employment of learning strategies (α = 0.81; 3.67 (0.79)), and reflection (α = 0.63; 3.68 (0.64)). Discussion The student performance dashboard provides efficient feedback access, yet students’ use of this information to guide learning is variable.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhancing reflection is a student outcome.
“| Coaching outcomes | Student | Enhancing reflection | [38,111,116] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 49
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [20]Mitchell Developing and using dashboard indicators in student affairs assessment—new directions for student services—Wiley Online library 2013
- Authors
- Hauer, K. E., Iverson, N., Quach, A., Yuan, P., Kaner, S., & Boscardin, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauer, Karen E.
- Boscardin, Christy
- Venue
- Perspectives on Medical Education
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2018-09-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 311-317
- ISSN
- 2212-2761 (ISSN-L)
- 2212-277X
- PMC
- PMC6191394
- OpenAlex
- W2891509491
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Perspectives on Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
- Keywords
- lifelong learning skills, medical students, performance dashboard, coaching, learning planning, student self-regulation, goal setting, reflection, feedback, learning strategies, first-year medical students
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Adult, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Feedback, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review