Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative study on the basis of adsorption capacity between CNTs and activated carbon as adsorbents for removal of noxious synthetic dyes: a review

Open access
Zare, Karim, Gupta, Vinod Kumar, Moradi, Omid, Makhlouf, Abdel Salam Hamdy, Sillanpää, Mika, Nadagouda, Mallikarjuna N., Sadegh, Hamidreza, Shahryari-ghoshekandi, Ramin, Pal, Angshuman, Wang, Zhou-jun, Tyagi, Inderjeet, Kazemi, Maryam·2015·Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

Abstract

Rapid removal of noxious synthetic dyes from wastewater is of great concern in the scientific research field, this is due to the expansion of harmful effects of synthetic dyes traces in water streams on the environment and human health with the exponential rise in concentration of synthetic dye globally and demand in various industries that coincided with the implantation of more stringent water quality standards. Various technologies have been applied for the removal of synthetic dye from wastewater, including adsorption technology, which has a great potential in treating varieties of synthetic dyes. This article comprehensively reviews the latest progress in the development of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and their applications for the removal of synthetic dyes from wastewater, including functionalized of CNTs and their researched counterparts. The emerging trends in the development of alternative adsorbents with different substrates, morphologies, and functional groups are also elucidated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40097-015-0158-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Zare, K., Gupta, V. K., Moradi, O., Makhlouf, A. S. H., Sillanpää, M., Nadagouda, M. N., Sadegh, H., Shahryari-ghoshekandi, R., Pal, A., Wang, Z.-J., Tyagi, I., & Kazemi, M.
Venue
Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry
Published
2015-04-22
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
227-236
ISSN
  • 2008-9244 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8865
OpenAlex
W2050592205
Cited by
219
References
3
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative study on the basis of adsorption capacity between CNTs and activated carbon as adsorbents for removal of noxious synthetic dyes: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40097-015-0158-x
The paper
Zare, K., Gupta, V. K., Moradi, O., Makhlouf, A. S. H., Sillanpää, M., Nadagouda, M. N., Sadegh, H., Shahryari-ghoshekandi, R., Pal, A., Wang, Z.-J., Tyagi, I., & Kazemi, M. (2015). A comparative study on the basis of adsorption capacity between CNTs and activated carbon as adsorbents for removal of noxious synthetic dyes: a review. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-015-0158-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.